Cited by 231Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Spike timing, calcium signals and synaptic plasticity

Sjöström, P·2002·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Plasticity at central synapses depends critically on the timing of presynaptic and postsynaptic action potentials. Key initial steps in synaptic plasticity involve the back-propagation of action potentials into the dendritic tree and calcium influx that depends nonlinearly on the action potential and synaptic input. These initial steps are now better understood. In addition, recent studies of processes as diverse as gene expression and channel inactivation suggest that responses to calcium transients depend not only their amplitude, but on their time course and on the location of their origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00325-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bayesian belief propagation and particle filtering are the most successful computer vision algorithms to date.

    “Bayesian belief propagation 18 -20 and particle filtering 21,22 are the most successful computer vision algorithms to date.”

    From Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex (2003) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Algorithms of this type, with separate sets of particles for bottom-up and top-down messages, constitute one of the most promising techniques for statistical inference in large, multilayered domains.

    “Algorithms of this type, although with separate sets of particles for bottom-up and top-down messages, are under active investigation in the computer vision community 19,20,22 and constitute one of the most promising techniques for statistical inference in such large, multilayered domains.”

    From Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex (2003) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sjöström, P.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Sjöström, P
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
305-314
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014900949
Cited by
231
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
spike timing, synaptic plasticity, calcium signaling, dendritic calcium influx, calcium transients, central synapses, gene expression, channel inactivation
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Calcium Signaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review