Cited by 119Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

A process model of cyberbullying in adolescence

Lazuras, Lambros, Barkoukis, Vassilis, Ourda, Despoina, Tsorbatzoudis, Haralambos·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.015

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Ourda, D., & Tsorbatzoudis, H.
Affiliations
  • South East European Research Centre (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Barkoukis, Vassilis
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
881-887
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970144033
Cited by
119
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, adolescents, moral disengagement, affective empathy, social norms, prototype similarity, moral self-regulation, risk factors, cyberbullying prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review