Cited by 56Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Anonymity and its role in digital aggression: A systematic review

Kim, M., Ellithorpe, M., Burt, S.A.·2023·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2023.101856

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This sense of anonymity can encourage behaviours that individuals would not exhibit in real life, such as harassment, verbal abuse, or sexually inappropriate actions.

    “This sense of anonymity can encourage behaviours that individuals would not exhibit in real life, such as harassment, verbal abuse, or sexually inappropriate actions (Kim & Ellithorpe, 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M., Ellithorpe, M., & Burt, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, M.
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
72
Pages
101856
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380362950
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 8
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
online aggression, anonymity, cyberbullying, aggression prevention, suicidal ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review