Cited by 281Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationDigital Communication and Language

“What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service

Open access
Piwek, Lukasz, Joinson, Adam·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.026

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piwek, L., & Joinson, A.
Affiliations
University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Piwek, Lukasz
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
54
Pages
358-367
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1223606126
Cited by
281
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
98.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N009614/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
Snapchat, instant messaging, adolescents, selfies, social capital, bonding social capital, bridging social capital, strong ties, weak ties, social media use patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review