Cited by 192Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchChemical Analysis and Environmental ImpactGroundwater flow and contamination studies

Deep seepage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances through the soil of a firefighter training site and subsequent groundwater contamination

Dauchy, Xavier, Boiteux, Virginie, Colin, Adeline, Hémard, Jessica, Bach, Cristina, Rosin, Christophe, Munoz, Jean-François·2019·Chemosphere

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are utilized in specific firefighting foams. The objectives of this study were i) to map PFAS distribution in the soil and groundwater of a firefighter training site active for more than 3 decades, ii) to locate the main points of entry of PFASs into the aquifer and iii) to identify which PFASs seeped most deeply into the soil. A total of 44 soil cores and 17 groundwater samples were collected. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6:2 FTSA) and 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonamide alkylbetaine (6:2 FTAB) were the most predominant PFASs in surface soil. The highest total PFAS concentrations (up to 357 μg/g) were measured in two areas. Both areas were considered as potential points of entry of PFASs into the aquifer since PFASs were detected in soil 15 m below the surface, despite the presence of clay layers. The highest total PFAS concentrations were recorded in the monitoring wells located in the perimeter of the firefighter training site and in the spring located downgradient in the direction of groundwater flow. They ranged from 300 to 8300 ng/L. The fluorotelomer 6:2 FTAB was quantified in 6 monitoring wells, suggesting that this FT can reach a water table 20 m below the ground's surface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.003

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dauchy, X., Boiteux, V., Colin, A., Hémard, J., Bach, C., Rosin, C., & Munoz, J.-F.
Affiliations
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR)
Corresponding author
Dauchy, Xavier
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
214
Pages
729-737
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895672753
Cited by
192
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
French Ministry of Health (DGS 216)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS contamination, firefighting foam, groundwater contamination, soil contamination, deep seepage, PFOS, entry points, clay layer, observation wells
MeSH terms
Flame Retardants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Sulfonic Acids, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Groundwater, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review