Cited by 378Electrochemical sensors and biosensorsNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringElectrochemical Analysis and Applications

Chronic microsensors for longitudinal, subsecond dopamine detection in behaving animals

Open access
Clark, Jeremy J, Sandberg, Stefan G, Wanat, Matthew J, Gan, Jerylin O, Horne, Eric A, Hart, Andrew S, Akers, Christina A, Parker, Jones G +5 more·2010·Nature Methods

Abstract

Neurotransmission operates on a millisecond timescale but is changed by normal experience or neuropathology over days to months. Despite the importance of long-term neurotransmitter dynamics, no technique exists to track these changes in a subject from day to day over extended periods of time. Here we describe and characterize a microsensor that can detect the neurotransmitter dopamine with subsecond temporal resolution over months in vivo in rats and mice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.1412

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • bHR rats that underwent Pavlovian training in the presence of a dopamine receptor antagonist did not acquire a sign-tracking CR, consistent with previous reports; however, dopamine antagonism had no effect on learning a goal-tracking CR in bLR rats.

    “Third, bHR rats that underwent Pavlovian training in the presence of a dopamine receptor antagonist did not acquire a sign-tracking CR, consistent with previous reports24; however, dopamine antagonism had no effect on learning a goal-tracking CR in bLR rats.”

    From A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning (2011) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The attribution of incentive salience is the product of previous experience (i.e., learned associations) interacting with an individual's genetic propensity and neurobiological state.

    “The attribution of incentive salience is the product of previous experience (i.e., learned associations) interacting with an individual’s genetic propensity and neurobiological state 16,24–27.”

    From A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning (2011) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Hornykiewicz O Kish SJ Adv. Neurol 1987 45 19 34 2881444
  2. [9]Phillips PEM Robinson DL Stuber GD Carelli RM Wightman RM Wang JQ Drugs of Abuse: Neurological Reviews and Protocols 2003 Totowa, NJ Humana Press 443 464

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, J. J., Sandberg, S. G., Wanat, M. J., Gan, J. O., Horne, E. A., Hart, A. S., Akers, C. A., Parker, J. G., Willuhn, I., Martinez, V., Evans, S. B., Stella, N., & Phillips, P. E. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Paul E M
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2009-12-27
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
126-129
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2014971298
Cited by
378
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2t32da007278-31)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007455)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079292)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32-DA007278, F32DA024540, R01DA014486, R21DA021793, R21DA024140)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007270)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Keywords
dopamine detection, electrochemical microsensors, chronic implantation, dopaminergic neurons, biocompatible sensors, rats, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Dopamine, Electrochemistry, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Mesencephalon, Microelectrodes, Miniaturization, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biosensing Techniques, Neurotransmitter Agents, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review