Cited by 178Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Quantitative analysis of the tissue response to chronically implanted microwire electrodes in rat cortex.

Winslow, Brent D., Tresco, Patrick A.·2010·Biomaterials

Abstract

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain how the brain tissue reaction to single unit recording electrodes influences biocompatibility including progressive changes in the spatial distribution of reactive astrocytes, and the loss of neurons over the indwelling period. To examine these hypotheses, the spatial distribution of biomarkers associated with the foreign body response to insulated microwires placed in rat cerebral cortex was analyzed 2, 4, and 12 weeks after implantation using quantitative methods. We observed a stereotypical tissue response that was similar in some aspects to that previously reported for penetrating planar silicon microelectrode arrays with some specific differences including an overall lower degree of cortical tissue reactivity. While we found no evidence that reactive gliosis increases over time or that neuronal loss is progressive, we did find evidence of persistent inflammation and enhanced BBB permeability at the electrode brain tissue interface that extended over the 3 month indwelling period and that exhibited more animal to animal variability at 3 months than at 2 and 4 weeks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.049

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systems have performed well during acute recordings, but failed to function reliably over clinically relevant timelines, the result of brain tissue reaction against implants.

    “Systems have performed well during acute recordings, but failed to function reliably over clinically relevant timelines, the result of brain tissue reaction against implants, making biocompatibility of implanted BCI systems a primary concern in current device design (Polikov et al., 2005; Winslow and Tresco, 2010; Tresco and Winslow, 2011).”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Winslow and Tresco, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winslow, B. D., & Tresco, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Tresco, Patrick A.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1558-1567
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975669290
Cited by
178
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 NS046770)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
microwire electrodes, chronic implantation, cerebral cortex, foreign body reaction, biocompatibility, reactive astrocytes, gliosis, neuronal loss, chronic inflammation, blood-brain barrier permeability, electrode-tissue interface
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Electrodes, Implanted, Myelin Basic Protein, Foreign-Body Reaction, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Immunoglobulin G, Microelectrodes, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuroglia, Neurons, Time Factors, Neurofilament Proteins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prosthesis Implantation, Antigens, Nuclear, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review