Cited by 76Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Endocrine-metabolic dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome: An evolutionary perspective

Open access
Dumesic, Daniel A., Abbott, David H., Sanchita, Smriti, Chazenbalk, Gregorio D.·2020·Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by hyperandrogenism, oligo-anovulation and polycystic ovarian morphology, with metabolic dysfunction from insulin resistance and abdominal fat accumulation worsened by obesity. As ancestral traits, these features could have favored abdominal fat deposition for energy use during starvation, but have evolved into different PCOS phenotypes with variable metabolic dysfunction. Adipose dysfunction in PCOS from hyperandrogenemia and hyperinsulinemia likely constrains subcutaneous (SC) fat storage, promoting lipotoxicity through ectopic lipid accumulation and oxidative stress, insulin resistance and inflammation in non-adipose tissue. Recent findings of inherently exaggerated SC abdominal stem cell development to adipocytes in women with PCOS, and PCOS-like traits in adult female monkeys with natural hyperandrogenemia, imply common ancestral origins of PCOS in both human and nonhuman primates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coemr.2020.02.013

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumesic, D. A., Abbott, D. H., Sanchita, S., & Chazenbalk, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Dumesic, Daniel A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
12
Pages
41-48
ISSN
2451-9650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011966340
Cited by
76
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-04-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon National Primate Research Center
  • University of Virginia
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, evolutionary medicine, hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, adipose tissue dysfunction, ectopic fat deposition, lipotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, subcutaneous adipose tissue, adipose-derived stem cells, hyperinsulinemia, non-human primates, ancestral traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review