Cited by 468Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Preferential fat deposition in subcutaneous versus visceral depots is associated with insulin sensitivity

Open access
McLaughlin, Tracey, Lamendola, Cindy, Liu, Alice, Abbasi, Fahim·2011·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies on the relationship between regional fat and insulin resistance yield mixed results. Our objective was to determine whether regional fat distribution, independent of obesity, is associated with insulin resistance. DESIGN: Subjects included 115 healthy, overweight/moderately obese adults with body mass index (BMI) 25-36.9 kg/m(2) who met predetermined criteria for being insulin resistant (IR) or insulin sensitive (IS) based on the modified insulin suppression test. Computerized tomography was used to quantify visceral adipose tissue (VAT), sc adipose tissue (SAT), and thigh adipose tissue. Fat mass in each depot was compared according to IR/IS group, adjusting for BMI and sex. RESULTS: Despite nearly identical mean BMI in the IR vs. IS groups, VAT and %VAT were significantly higher in the IR group, whereas SAT, %SAT, and thigh sc fat were significantly lower. In logistic regression analysis, each sd increase in VAT increased the odds of being IR by 80%, whereas each increase in SAT decreased the odds by 48%; each increase in thigh fat decreased the odds by 59% and retained significance after adjusting for other depots. When grouped by VAT tertile, IS vs. IR individuals had significantly more SAT. There was no statistically significant interaction between sex and these relationships. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that after adjustment for BMI and VAT mass, sc abdominal and thigh fat are protective for insulin resistance, whereas VAT, after adjustment for SAT and BMI, has the opposite effect. Whether causal in nature or a marker of underlying pathology, these results clarify that regional distribution of fat-favoring sc depots is associated with lower risk for insulin resistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2011-0615

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excess accumulation of SAT is much less likely to cause insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction and explains why IR is not observed in all obese individuals.

    “In addition, excess accumulation of SAT is much less likely to cause IR and metabolic dysfunction and explains why IR is not observed in all obese individuals [151,181].”
  • An increase in VAT is thought to reflect the relative inability of the subcutaneous adipose tissue depot to sufficiently expand its clearance and storage capacity in response to caloric excess.

    “An increase in VAT is thought to reflect the relative inability of the subcutaneous adipose tissue depot to sufficiently expand its clearance and storage capacity in response to caloric excess (44).”

    From The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance (2015) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLaughlin, T., Lamendola, C., Liu, A., & Abbasi, F.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
McLaughlin, Tracey
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
96
Issue
11
Pages
E1756-E1760
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2086823329
Cited by
468
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
22.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK071309, R01DK071333)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K23RR016071, RR 000070, M01RR000070, 5K23 RR16071)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Keywords
insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity, visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue, regional fat distribution, thigh fat, visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio, overweight adults, obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Radiography, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Subcutaneous Fat, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Adiposity, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review