Cited by 500Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesHearing Impairment and Communication

Gesturing makes learning last

Open access
Cook, Susan Wagner, Mitchell, Zachary, Goldin-Meadow, Susan·2008·Cognition

Abstract

The gestures children spontaneously produce when explaining a task predict whether they will subsequently learn that task. Why? Gesture might simply reflect a child's readiness to learn a particular task. Alternatively, gesture might itself play a role in learning the task. To investigate these alternatives, we experimentally manipulated children's gesture during instruction in a new mathematical concept. We found that requiring children to gesture while learning the new concept helped them retain the knowledge they had gained during instruction. In contrast, requiring children to speak, but not gesture, while learning the concept had no effect on solidifying learning. Gesturing can thus play a causal role in learning, perhaps by giving learners an alternative, embodied way of representing new ideas. We may be able to improve children's learning just by encouraging them to move their hands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instructing children to make particular kinds of gestures while practicing solving mathematics problems themselves after having received explanations by the teacher advanced their learning compared with children who were instructed only to speak during practice.

    “A study by Cook et al. (2008) revealed that instructing children to make particular kinds of gestures while practicing solving mathematics problems themselves after having received explanations by the teacher, advanced their learning compared with children who were instructed only to speak during practice.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Susan Wagner
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
1047-1058
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134774969
Cited by
500
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD047450, R01-HD47450)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
gesture, learning retention, mathematics learning, embodied cognition, children's learning, verbal instructions, knowledge retention
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Gestures, Humans, Learning, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review