CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals

Zirnstein, Megan, van Hell, Janet G., Kroll, Judith F.·2018·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001PMC PMC5953823
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Bak, 2014, Does bilingualism influence cognitive aging?, Annals of Neurology, 75, 959, 10.1002/ana.24158 · DOI
  2. Baum, 2014, Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging, Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 857, 10.1017/S0142716414000174 · DOI
  3. Baus, 2013, On the effects of second language immersion on first language production, Acta Psychologica, 142, 402, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.010 · DOI
  4. Bialystok, 2012, Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240, 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Boudewyn, 2015, Individual differences in language processing: Electrophysiological approaches, Language and Linguistics Compass, 9, 406, 10.1111/lnc3.12167 · DOI
  6. Boudewyn, 2012, Does discourse congruence influence spoken language comprehension before lexical association? Evidence from event-related potentials, Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 698, 10.1080/01690965.2011.577980 · DOI
  7. Boudewyn, 2012, Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken language comprehension, Neuropsychologia, 50, 2659, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.019 · DOI
  8. Boudewyn, 2013, Effects of working memory span on processing of lexical associations and congruence in spoken discourse, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 60, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00060 · DOI
  9. Braver, 2001, Context processing in older adults: Evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 746, 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.746 · DOI
  10. Brothers, 2015, Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence, Cognition, 136, 135, 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017 · DOI
  11. Brysbaert, 2009, Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English, Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bubic, 2010, Prediction, cognition and the brain, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1
  13. Camblin, 2007, The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking, Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 103, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.005 · DOI
  14. Clahsen, 2006, Grammatical processing in language learners, Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3, 10.1017/S0142716406060024 · DOI
  15. Cohen, 1999, Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 120, 10.1037/0021-843X.108.1.120 · DOI
  16. Coulson, 2005, Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: An even-related brain potential study, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 494, 10.1162/0898929053279568 · DOI
  17. Dambacher, 2006, Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading, Brain Research, 1084, 89, 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010 · DOI
  18. Davelaar, 2009, Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: A direct comparison of two competing accounts, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 121, 10.3758/PBR.16.1.121 · DOI
  19. DeLong, 2012, Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading, Brain and Language, 121, 226, 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.02.006 · DOI
  20. Delorme, 2004, EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  21. den Ouden, 2012, How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation, Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1
  22. Dussias, 2010, Usage frequencies of complement-taking verbs in Spanish and English: Data from Spanish monolinguals and Spanish-English bilinguals, Behavior & Research Methods, 42, 1004, 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1004 · DOI
  23. Egner, 2007, Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 380, 10.3758/CABN.7.4.380 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Federmeier, 2007, Thinking ahead: The role of roots and prediction in language comprehension, Psychophysiology, 44, 491, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x · DOI
  25. Federmeier, 1999, A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing, Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469, 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660 · DOI
  26. Federmeier, 2010, Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension, Brain & Language, 115, 149, 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006 · DOI
  27. Federmeier, 2002, The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study, Psychophysiology, 39, 133, 10.1111/1469-8986.3920133 · DOI
  28. Federmeier, 2007, Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing, Brain Research, 1146, 75, 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101 · DOI
  29. Foucart, 2015, Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension, Neuropsychologia, 75, 291, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.027 · DOI
  30. Foucart, 2014, Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1461
  31. Frenck-Mestre, 1997, Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 119, 10.1080/027249897392251 · DOI
  32. Fricke, M., Zirnstein, M., Navarro-Torres, C., & Kroll, J. F. (in press). Bilingualism reveals fundamental variation in language processing, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
  33. Gernsbacher, 1996, The structure-building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why, Models of Understanding Text, 289
  34. Gernsbacher, 1997, Two decades of structure building, Discourse Processes, 23, 265, 10.1080/01638539709544994 · DOI
  35. Gernsbacher, 1991, The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245
  36. Gernsbacher, 1990, Investigating differences in general comprehension skill, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430
  37. Giezen, 2015, Parallel language activation and inhibitory control in bimodal bilinguals, Cognition, 141, 9, 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.009 · DOI
  38. Gold, 2013, Lifelong bilingualism maintains neural efficiency for cognitive control in aging, The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 387, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3837-12.2013 · DOI
  39. Green, 2013, Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515, 10.1080/20445911.2013.796377 · DOI
  40. Hasegawa, 2002, An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload, NeuroImage, 15, 647, 10.1006/nimg.2001.1001 · DOI
  41. Hintz, 2016, Encouraging prediction during production facilitates subsequent comprehension: Evidence from interleaved object naming in sentence context and sentence reading, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1056, 10.1080/17470218.2015.1131309 · DOI
  42. Hsu, 2016, Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during real-time language processing, Psychological Science, 27, 572, 10.1177/0956797615625223 · DOI
  43. Huettig, 2016, Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 19, 10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223 · DOI
  44. Jasper, 1958, Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 370, 10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Kaan, 2014, Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different?, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257, 10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa · DOI
  46. Kaan, 2016, Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 1, 10.1017/S1366728914000844 · DOI
  47. Kutas, 1984, Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association, Nature, 307, 161, 10.1038/307161a0 · DOI
  48. Lagrou, 2013, The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition, Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 16, 508, 10.1017/S1366728912000508 · DOI
  49. Laszlo, 2011, The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects, Psychophysiology, 48, 176, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x · DOI
  50. Linck, 2009, Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second language learning, Psychological Science, 20, 1507, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. Loncke, 2011, Executive control is shared between sentence processing and digit maintenance: Evidence from a strictly timed dual-task paradigm, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 886, 10.1080/20445911.2011.586625 · DOI
  52. Luo, 2010, Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals, Cognition, 114, 29, 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Martin, 2013, Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do, Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 574, 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001 · DOI
  54. McDonald, 2006, Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language users, Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006 · DOI
  55. McLaughlin, 2010, Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning, Language Learning, 60, 123, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00604.x · DOI
  56. Meuter, 1999, Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection, Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25, 10.1006/jmla.1998.2602 · DOI
  57. Misra, 2012, When bilinguals choose a single word to speak: Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of the native language, Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 224, 10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.001 · DOI
  58. Nakano, 2010, Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2886, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21400 · DOI
  59. Nuechterlein, 1991, Vigilance in schizophrenia and related disorders, Vol. 5, 397
  60. Ong, G., Sewell, D. K., Weekes, B., McKague, M., & Abutalebi, J. (2016). A diffusion model approach to analyzing the bilingual advantage for the Flanker task: The role of attentional control processes. Journal of Neurolinguistics. · DOI
  61. Parker, 2012, Where, when and why brain activation differs for bilinguals and monolinguals during picture naming and reading aloud, Cerebral Cortex, 22, 892, 10.1093/cercor/bhr161 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Pivneva, 2014, Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 787
  63. Prior, 2017, Is susceptibility to cross-language interference domain specific?, Cognition, 165, 10, 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.006 · DOI
  64. Rohrer, 1995, Retrieval from semantic memory and its implications for Alzheimer’s disease, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1127
  65. Sandoval, 2010, What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency: The dual-task analogy, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 231, 10.1017/S1366728909990514 · DOI
  66. Schwartz, 2006, Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context, Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 197, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Tanner, 2014, Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 277, 10.1017/S1366728913000370 · DOI
  68. Teubner-Rhodes, 2016, The effects of bilingualism on conflict monitoring, cognitive control, and garden-path recovery, Cognition, 150, 213, 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.011 · DOI
  69. Titone, 2011, Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 inter-mixing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412
  70. Van Assche, 2011, The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading, Journal of Memory and Language., 64, 88, 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.006 · DOI
  71. Van Assche, 2013, The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading, Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 88, 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.006 · DOI
  72. Van Assche, 2013, Whole-language and item-specific control in bilingual language production, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1781
  73. Van Berkum, 2008, Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 376, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00609.x · DOI
  74. Van Berkum, 1999, Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657, 10.1162/089892999563724 · DOI
  75. Van Hell, 2008, Sentence context affects lexical decision and word translation, Acta Psychologica, 128, 431, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.010 · DOI
  76. Van Hell, 2012, Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation, Language Learning, 62, 148, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00710.x · DOI
  77. Van Petten, 1993, A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials, Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 485, 10.1080/01690969308407586 · DOI
  78. Wilson, 1988, The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, version 2, Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 6, 10.3758/BF03202594 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 84

Metadata

Authors
Zirnstein, M., van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
176
Pages
87-106
ISSN
0010-0277
DOI
10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001
PMC
PMC5953823
Cited by
84
References
5
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HD082796, HD053146)
  • National Science Foundation (SMA-1657782, OISE-1545900, BCS-1535124, SMA-1409973, OISE-0968369, BCS-1349110)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review