Cited by 2,694Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSport Psychology and Performance

Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

McAuley, Edward, Duncan, Terry, Tammen, Vance V.·1989·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Abstract

The present study was designed to assess selected psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (Ryan, 1982), a multidimensional measure of subjects' experience with regard to experimental tasks. Subjects (N = 116) competed in a basketball free-throw shooting game, following which they completed the IMI. The LISREL VI computer program was employed to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis to assess the tenability of a five factor hierarchical model representing four first-order factors or dimensions and a second-order general factor representing intrinsic motivation. Indices of model acceptability tentatively suggest that the sport data adequately fit the hypothesized five factor hierarchical model. Alternative models were tested but did not result in significant improvements in the goodness-of-fit indices, suggesting the proposed model to be the most accurate of the models tested. Coefficient alphas for the four dimensions and the overall scale indicated adequate reliability. The results are discussed with regard to the importance of accurate assessment of psychological constructs and the use of linear structural equations in confirming the factor structures of measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
1989-03
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
48-58
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2150454725
Cited by
2,694
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 180 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 232 · 2022: 191 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 101
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, intrinsic motivation, psychometric properties, factor structure, basketball, free throw shooting, competitive sports, motivation measurement
MeSH terms
Adult, Basketball, Competitive Behavior, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review