Cited by 90Archaeological Research and ProtectionUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Basics of Least Cost Analysis for Archaeological Applications

White, Devin Alan·2015·Advances in Archaeological Practice

Abstract

Least Cost Analysis (LCA) is a geospatially focused quantitative approach that can help archaeologists better understand how people may have moved across a landscape. At its core is the assumption that humans make decisions about movement as fully rational actors with complete knowledge of the landscape, attempting to minimize the cost of that movement as they travel from one location to another. LCA is most often used to construct a small number of hypothetical routes between locations of interest and, when used effectively, can even lead to the creation of entire transportation networks. Desktop GIS software packages, both commercial and open source, make running LCA relatively straightforward, but that does not necessarily mean that the output is informative or accurate. The following tutorial is designed to expose the reader to the foundational steps required to complete an LCA workflow, along with the scientific rationale behind each step and how to avoid potential pitfalls that one might run into along the way. Relevant literature is cited throughout the tutorial in order to provide context for the technical methods that underpin available tools, to suggest various ways that LCA can be used to solve archaeological problems, and to show the art of the possible.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.407

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Hudson, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 97
  2. White, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 188
  3. Richards-Risetto, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 109
  4. Gietl, 2008, Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology.
  5. Bell, 2000, Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, 85
  6. Rademaker, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 32
  7. Ullah, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 155
  8. Branting Scott 2004 Iron Age Pedestrians at Kerkenes Dag: An Archaeological GIS-T Approach to Movement and Transportation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Buffalo.
  9. Branting, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 209
  10. Whitley, 2003, A Geographic Information Systems Approach to Understanding Potential Prehistoric and Historic Travel Corridors, Southeastern Archaeology, 22, 77
  11. Tobler, 1993, Three Presentations on Geographical Analysis and Modeling. Technical
  12. Livingood, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 174
  13. Surface-Evans, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 128
  14. Phillips, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 46
  15. Kantner, 2012, Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes, 225

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
White, D. A.
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2015-11
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
407-414
ISSN
2326-3768 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557563356
Cited by
90
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Archaeological Practice (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Battelle
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
cost-minimization analysis, human movement, landscape archaeology, transportation networks, route construction, cost surface, rational actor model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review