Cited by 249Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Multiple signals in anterior cingulate cortex

Open access
Kolling, N, Behrens, TEJ, Wittmann, MK, Rushworth, MFS·2016·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Activity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been linked both to commitment to a course of action, even when it is associated with costs, and to exploring or searching for alternative courses of action. Here we review evidence that this is due to the presence of multiple signals in ACC reflecting the updating of beliefs and internal models of the environment and encoding aspects of choice value, including the average value of choices afforded by the environment ('search value'). We contrast this evidence with the influential view that ACC activity is better described as reflecting task difficulty. A consideration of cortical neural network properties explains why ACC may carry such signals and also exhibit sensitivity to task difficulty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.007

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the regions identified in the present study were found to encode choice difficulty across both the cognitive and physical domains.

    “Furthermore, although some of these domain-general regions may be involved in processing decision difficulty in certain contexts [50], this is not always the case [51], and none of the regions identified in the present study were found to encode choice difficulty across both the cognitive and physical domains.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolling, N., Behrens, T., Wittmann, M., & Rushworth, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kolling, N
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
37
Pages
36-43
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2229769847
Cited by
249
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 18
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (104765/Z/14/Z, 104765, 100973/Z/13/Z, 101092/Z/13/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, decision-making, commitment to action, exploration, belief updating, choice value, task difficulty, neural network properties, cost-based decision making
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Environment, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review