Cited by 96Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Choice Coding in Frontal Cortex during Stimulus-Guided or Action-Guided Decision-Making

Open access
Luk, Chung-Hay, Wallis, Jonathan D.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

To optimally obtain desirable outcomes, organisms must track outcomes predicted by stimuli in the environment (stimulus–outcome or SO associations) and outcomes predicted by their own actions (action–outcome or AO associations). Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are implicated in tracking outcomes, but anatomical and functional studies suggest a dissociation, with ACC and OFC responsible for encoding AO and SO associations, respectively. To examine whether this dissociation held at the single neuron level, we trained two subjects to perform choice tasks that required using AO or SO associations. OFC and ACC neurons encoded the action that the subject used to indicate its choice, but this encoding was stronger in OFC during the SO task and stronger in ACC during the AO task. These results are consistent with a division of labor between the two areas in terms of using rewards associated with either stimuli or actions to guide decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4920-12.2013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OFC encodes outcome-related information during Pavlovian (cue-outcome) learning rather than during instrumental (action-outcome) learning, while ACC shows the opposite contribution.

    “In line with this, comparative studies of ACC and OFC highlight their dissociative roles in encoding outcome value; the OFC encodes outcome-related information during Pavlovian (cue-outcome) learning rather than during the instrumental (action-outcome) learning, while the opposite contribution is found in the ACC47,48.”

    From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results report a small proportion of OFC neurons encoding stimulus–outcome associations and ACC neurons encoding action–outcome associations, consistent with the claimed direction. But they found no difference between areas in the prevalence or strength of outcome encoding across tasks. The Discussion also says the stimulus–outcome task could not be performed through Pavlovian approach responses, so calling this a finding about Pavlovian learning overstates the study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Petrides M Pandya DN Boller F Grafman J 1994 Comparative architectonic analysis of the human and macaque frontal cortex Handbook of Neuropsychology 17 57 New York Elsevier

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luk, C.-H., & Wallis, J. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-01-30
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1864-1871
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2086244298
Cited by
96
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019028, F31DA026352)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS040813)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, action-outcome associations, stimulus-outcome associations, decision-making, single-unit recording, reward prediction, functional specialization, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Cues, Decision Making, Frontal Lobe, Macaca mulatta, Male, Movement, Neurons, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review