Cited by 432Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeception detection and forensic psychology

The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies

Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G., Harari, Hagai, Aharon-Peretz, Judith, Levkovitz, Yechiel·2010·Cortex

Abstract

Individuals with psychopathy show impaired emotional and social behavior, such as lack of emotional responsiveness to others and deficient empathy. However, there are controversies regarding these individuals theory of mind (ToM) abilities and the neuroanatomical basis of their aberrant social behavior. The present study tested the hypothesis that impairment in the emotional aspects of ToM (affective ToM) rather than general ToM abilities may account for the impaired social behavior observed in psychopathy and that this pattern of performance may be associated with orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) dysfunction. To assess the emotional and cognitive aspects of ToM we used a task that examines affective versus cognitive ToM processing in separate conditions. ToM abilities of criminal offender diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder with high psychopathy features were compared to that of participants with localized lesions in the OFC or dorsolateral, participants with non-frontal lesions, and healthy control subjects. Individuals with psychopathy and those with OFC lesions were impaired on the 'affective ToM' conditions but not in cognitive ToM conditions, compared to the control groups. It was concluded that the pattern of mentalizing impairments in psychopathy resembles remarkably that seen in participants with lesions of the frontal lobe, particularly with OFC damage, providing support for the notion of amygdala-OFC dysfunction in psychopathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.008

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Harari, H., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Levkovitz, Y.
Affiliations
Shalvata Mental Health Center (IL)
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
668-677
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030904969
Cited by
432
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, affective theory of mind, theory of mind, psychopathy, antisocial personality disorder, offenders, affective empathy, social behavior, frontal lobe lesions, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Brain Diseases, Cognition, Emotions, Empathy, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult, Theory of Mind, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review