Cited by 277Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

An analysis of post-event processing in social anxiety disorder

Brozovich, Faith, Heimberg, Richard G.·2008·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that self-focused thoughts and negative affect have a reciprocal relationship [Mor, N., Winquist, J. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638-662]. In the anxiety disorder literature, post-event processing has emerged as a specific construction of repetitive self-focused thoughts that pertain to social anxiety disorder. Post-event processing can be defined as an individual's repeated consideration and potential reconstruction of his performance following a social situation. Post-event processing can also occur when an individual anticipates a social or performance event and begins to brood about other, past social experiences. The present review examined the post-event processing literature in an attempt to organize and highlight the significant results. The methodologies employed to study post-event processing have included self-report measures, daily diaries, social or performance situations created in the laboratory, and experimental manipulations of post-event processing or anticipation of an upcoming event. Directions for future research on post-event processing are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.01.002

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brozovich, F., & Heimberg, R. G.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Heimberg, Richard G.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
891-903
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083181977
Cited by
277
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
post-event processing, social anxiety disorder, negative affect, self-focus, performance anxiety, daily diary
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Processes, Mental Recall, Self-Assessment, Self Disclosure, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Stress, Psychological, Self Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review