Cited by 307Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Disgust, fear, and the anxiety disorders: a critical review

Open access
Cisler, Josh M., Olatunji, Bunmi O., Lohr, Jeffrey M.·2009·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Anxiety disorders have traditionally been conceptualized as reflecting the emotions of fear and anxiety. A developing program of research demonstrates a relation between disgust and three specific anxiety disorders: blood-injection-injury (BII) phobia, spider phobia, and contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This review serves three purposes. First, the authors review the response patterns predicted to be observed if the emotional response in these disorders involved disgust versus fear. The review suggests specific response patterns that characterize disgust and fear in the domains of heart rate, facial expression, neural activity, and cognitive processes. Second, the authors review extant research employing measures of these domains in spider phobia, BII phobia, and contamination-related OCD. The evidence suggests that both fear and disgust characterize each of these disorders, but the magnitude at which the emotions characterize the disorders may depend on the response domain measured. For example, disgust may be more involved in spider phobia in appraisals and facial expression, but less involved in neural correlates or heart rate domains. Third, the authors suggest guidelines for future research, including concurrent use of specific measures as well as examining whether the different emotions in different response domains respond to similar interventions (e.g., exposure).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.09.007

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ICD-11 guidelines alert clinicians to the diversity of emotional reactions (e.g., shame, disgust, anger) that may manifest in anxiety and fear-related disorders.

    “the ICD-11 guidelines also alert clinicians to the diversity of emotional reactions (e.g., shame, disgust, anger) that may manifest in these disorders.[42][43][44][45][46]”

    From The Classification of Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in the ICD-11: Review: Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in ICD-11 (2016) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction and Abstract say that disgust, in addition to fear and anxiety, can characterize certain anxiety disorders. They do not address ICD-11 guidelines or say that those guidelines alert clinicians to shame, disgust, and anger; the guidelines mentioned in the Abstract are recommendations for future research. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 160 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schienle A Stark R Walter B Vaitl D The connection between disgust sensitivity and blood-related fears, faintness symptoms, and obsessive-compulsiveness in a non-clinical sample Anxiety, Stress, and Coping: An International Journal 2003 16 185 193
  2. Vrana SR Startle reflex response during sensory modality specific disgust, anger, and neutral imagery Journal of Psychophysiology 1994 8 211 218

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cisler, J. M., Olatunji, B. O., & Lohr, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Cisler, Josh M.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
34-46
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055855211
Cited by
307
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH018869)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
disgust, fear, anxiety disorders, blood-injection-injury phobia, spider phobia, heart rate, facial expressions, neural correlates, cognitive appraisal, exposure therapy
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Facial Expression, Fear, Heart Rate, Humans, Phobic Disorders, Spiders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review