Cited by 32Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The beneficial effects of meditation: contribution of the anterior cingulate and locus coeruleus.

Open access
Craigmyle, Nancy A.·2013·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

During functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of meditation the cortical salience detecting and executive networks become active during "awareness of mind wandering," "shifting," and "sustained attention." The anterior cingulate (AC) is activated during "awareness of mind wandering." The AC modulates both the peripheral sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the central locus coeruleus (LC) norepinephrine systems, which form the principal neuromodulatory system, regulating in multiple ways both neuronal and non-neuronal cells to maximize adaptation in changing environments. The LC is the primary source of central norepinephrine (C-NE) and nearly the exclusive source of cortical norepinephrine. Normally activated by novel or salient stimuli, the AC initially inhibits the SNS reflexively, lowering peripheral norepinephrine and activates the LC, increasing C-NE. Moderate levels of C-NE enhance working memory through alpha 2 adrenergic receptors, while higher levels of C-NE, acting on alpha 1 and beta receptors, enhance other executive network functions such as the stopping of ongoing behavior, attentional set-shifting, and sustained attention. The actions of the AC on both the central and peripheral noradrenergic systems are implicated in the beneficial effects of meditation. This paper will explore some of the known functions and interrelationships of the AC, SNS, and LC with respect to their possible relevance to meditation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00731

Cites

238 of 238 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of ACC is observed in breath-focused mindfulness tasks and deep meditation, and decreased in experienced meditators when converting to a state of mindfulness.

    “The activation of ACC was observed in breath-focused mindfulness tasks (Lazar et al., 2000; Hölzel et al., 2007), deep meditation (Craigmyle, 2013), and decreased in experienced meditators when converting to a state of mindfulness (Ritskes et al., 2003).”

    From Enhanced Resting-State Functional Connectivity With Decreased Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations of the Salience Network in Mindfulness Novices (2022) · cites this paper as Craigmyle, 2013

    The Introduction reports anterior cingulate activation during awareness of mind wandering in focused mindfulness meditation, and the Discussion describes its activity during mindfulness meditation. Neither passage identifies the observed activation as occurring in deep meditation, the specific condition for which the citing sentence invokes Craigmyle. The breath-focused and experienced-meditator clauses have separate citations and are not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brady J. V. (1967). “Emotion and the sensitivity of the psychoendocrine systems,” in Neurophysiology and Emotion ed. Glass D. C. (New York: Rockefeller University Press and Russell Sage Foundation) 70– 95
  2. Mandler G. (1967). “The conditions for emotional behavior,” in Neurophysiology and Emotion ed. Glass D. C. (New York: Rockefeller University Press and Russell Sage Foundation) 96– 102
  3. Redmond D. E. Jr. (1977). “Alterations in the function of the nucleus locus coeruleus: a possible model for studies of anxiety,” in Animal Models in Psychiatry and Neurology eds Hanin I. Usdin E. (Oxford: Pergamon) 293– 303

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craigmyle, N. A.
Corresponding author
Craigmyle, Nancy A.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
4
Pages
731-731
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139103123
Cited by
32
References
237
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
meditation, anterior cingulate cortex, locus coeruleus, norepinephrine, sympathetic nervous system, mind wandering, sustained attention, executive function, salience network, alpha2-adrenoceptors, set-shifting, working memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review