Cited by 77Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Binding of Episodic Memories in the Rat

Open access
Crystal, Jonathon D., Smith, Alexandra E.·2014·Current Biology

Abstract

People remember an event as a coherent scene. Memory of such an episode is thought to reflect binding of a fully integrated representation, rather than memory of unconnected features. However, it is not known whether rodents form bound representations. Here we show that rats remember episodes as bound representations. Rats were presented with multiple features of unique episodes at memory encoding: what (food flavor), where (maze location), source (self-generated food seeking—running to the food site—or experimenter-generated food seeking—placement by the experimenter at the food site), and context (spatial cues in the room where the event occurred). After a delay, the trial continued with a memory assessment in which one flavor replenished at the self-generated—but not at experimenter-generated—locations. We presented rats with multiple overlapping features, in rapid succession, to ensure that successful memory retrieval required them to disambiguate multiple study episodes (using two rooms). We found that binding is resistant to interference from highly similar episodes and survives long retention intervals (∼1 week). Our results suggest that multiple episodic memories are each structured as bound representations, which suggests that nonhumans represent episodic memories using a structure similar to that of people. This finding enhances the translational potential for utilizing animal models of episodic memory to explore the biological mechanisms of memory and validate therapeutic approaches for treating disorders of memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.074

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using the what-where-when paradigm predominantly focus on the content criterion, and there is little evidence for the structure and flexibility criteria in the literature.

    “these predominantly focus on the content criterion, and as a result, there is little evidence for the structure (but see [68,75]) and flexibility (but see [74]) criteria in the literature.”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

  • The same binding of multiple event features, permitting discrimination between two similar events, has also been demonstrated in rats and apes.

    “The same binding of multiple event features, permitting the discrimination between two similar events, has also been demonstrated in rats and apes [68,75].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crystal, J. D., & Smith, A. E.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Crystal, Jonathon D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
24
Issue
24
Pages
2957-2961
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994823121
Cited by
77
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG044530)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH098985)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, memory binding, rats, source memory, spatial context, food flavor, memory interference, memory retention, animal models of memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Male, Mental Recall, Taste, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review