Cited by 82Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Source Memory in the Rat

Open access
Crystal, Jonathon D., Alford, Wesley T., Zhou, Wenyi, Hohmann, Andrea G.·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

Source memory is a representation of the origin (source) of information. When source information is bound together, it makes a memory episodic, allowing us to differentiate one event from another. Here, we asked whether rats remember the source of encoded information. Rats foraged for distinctive flavors of food that replenished (or failed to replenish) at its recently encountered location according to a source-information rule. To predict replenishment, rats needed to remember where they had encountered a preferred food type (chocolate) with self-generated (walking along a runway encountering chocolate) or experimenter-generated (placement of the rat at the chocolate site by an experimenter) cues. Three lines of evidence implicate the presence of source memory. First, rats selectively adjusted revisits to the chocolate location based on source information, under conditions in which familiarity of events could not produce successful performance. Second, source memory was dissociated from location memory by different decay rates. Third, temporary inactivation of the CA3 region of the hippocampus with lidocaine selectively eliminated source memory, suggesting that source memory is dependent upon an intact hippocampus. Development of an animal model of source memory may be valuable to probe the biological underpinnings of memory disorders marked by impairments in source memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.023

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Schacter DL Tulving E Memory Systems 1994 Cambridge, MA MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crystal, J. D., Alford, W. T., Zhou, W., & Hohmann, A. G.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Crystal, Jonathon D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
387-391
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101704980
Cited by
82
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
source memory, episodic memory, rats, hippocampus, CA3, lidocaine inactivation, location memory, memory decay, memory disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Hippocampus, Male, Spatial Behavior, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review