Cited by 72Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Episodic recollection in animals: “if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ….”

Eichenbaum, Howard, Fortin, Norbert J., Ergorul, Ceren, Wright, Sean P., Agster, Kara L.·2005·Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.006

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eichenbaum, H., Fortin, N. J., Ergorul, C., Wright, S. P., & Agster, K. L.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Eichenbaum, Howard
Venue
Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
190-207
ISSN
0023-9690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148589270
Cited by
72
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
episodic memory, episodic recollection, animal cognition, rats, recognition memory, temporal order memory, memory replay, hippocampus, memory binding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review