Cited by 279Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 38 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Positive parenting predicts the development of adolescent brain structure: A longitudinal study

Open access

Abstract

Little work has been conducted that examines the effects of positive environmental experiences on brain development to date. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the effects of positive (warm and supportive) maternal behavior on structural brain development during adolescence, using longitudinal structural MRI. Participants were 188 (92 female) adolescents, who were part of a longitudinal adolescent development study that involved mother-adolescent interactions and MRI scans at approximately 12 years old, and follow-up MRI scans approximately 4 years later. FreeSurfer software was used to estimate the volume of limbic-striatal regions (amygdala, hippocampus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, and nucleus accumbens) and the thickness of prefrontal regions (anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices) across both time points. Higher frequency of positive maternal behavior during the interactions predicted attenuated volumetric growth in the right amygdala, and accelerated cortical thinning in the right anterior cingulate (males only) and left and right orbitofrontal cortices, between baseline and follow up. These results have implications for understanding the biological mediators of risk and protective factors for mental disorders that have onset during adolescence.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a longitudinal community sample of adolescents, observed positive maternal behavior during a conflictual interaction predicted structural brain development from early to mid-adolescence, including reduced right amygdala growth and greater left/right OFC thinning. Effects were partly sex-specific for right ACC thinning in males and were not explained by aggressive maternal behavior.

Key findings

  • Higher positive maternal behavior predicted reduced growth of the right amygdala (β = −0.284, p = 0.014) and greater thinning of the left and right OFC (β = −0.262, p = 0.024; β = −0.258, p = 0.022).
  • Positive maternal behavior × sex predicted right ACC change (β = −0.311, p = 0.045); follow-up analyses showed greater right ACC thinning in males (β = −0.525, p = 0.007) but no association in females (β = 0.042, p = 0.789).
  • Aggressive maternal behavior predicted increased growth of the right putamen (β = 0.306, p = 0.012); positive maternal behavior effects were not better explained by aggressive maternal behavior.
  • Positive parenting was not associated with the structure of the majority of regions at baseline or follow-up (reported as Supplementary data).

Methods

  • Participants were a community sample of 188 adolescents (92 females) from metropolitan Melbourne, Australia; 163 completed baseline mother–adolescent interaction tasks, and 102 had acceptable baseline and follow-up MRI data (mean follow-up = 3.78 years, SD = 0.20; baseline MRI age = 12.62, SD = 0.44; follow-up MRI age = 16.42, SD = 0.50).
  • Mother–adolescent dyads completed videotaped event-planning and problem-solving interactions coded with the LIFE system; positive maternal behavior was taken from the problem-solving interaction and aggressive maternal behavior from the event-planning interaction. MRI was processed with FreeSurfer longitudinal stream for subcortical volumes (amygdala, hippocampus, caudate, nucleus accumbens, putamen, pallidum) and cortical thickness (ACC, OFC).
  • Hierarchical linear regressions predicted residualized ROI change scores, with covariates age, SES, IQ, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and aggressive maternal behavior; positive maternal behavior and sex were entered next, followed by their interaction. Missing data were handled with FIML in Mplus.

Limitations

  • Stated: only two imaging time points limited modeling to linear patterns of brain development, so non-linear effects and effects extending into late adolescence or adulthood could not be assessed.
  • Stated: only one observed measure of positive parenting was used; fathers were not included; temperament-based sampling may restrict generalizability; no correction for multiple comparisons was applied; some FreeSurfer structures (particularly amygdala and nucleus accumbens) have relatively low reliability; multisite scanner/sequence bias was possible though post-acquisition procedures and an inter-scanner reliability assessment were used.
  • Evident from the text: the observational longitudinal design cannot establish causal effects, and the MRI sample was 102 with complete-case analyses also run in 77 participants, which may limit power and generalizability alongside the temperament oversampling.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.10.006

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 41 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 10
34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little work has examined the effects of positive parenting on brain structure in children and adolescents.

    “Despite this evidence, to date, little work has been conducted that examines the effects of positive parenting on brain structure in children and adolescents.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    None of the existing research has assessed longitudinal measures of brain development.

    “Second, to our knowledge, none of the existing research has assessed longitudinal measures of brain development.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The longitudinal associations between positive parenting and adolescent brain structure reflect causal effects of positive parenting rather than unmeasured confounding.

    “we have found, for the first time, longitudinal effects of positive parenting on structural development of the brain during adolescence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No other human study to date has reported an effect of positive parenting on amygdala structure.

    “Although no other human study to date has reported an effect of positive parenting on amygdala structure”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Abnormalities in the structure and function of the amygdala, OFC, and ACC have been found in both adolescent and adult depression.

    “Abnormalities in the structure and function of all of the regions associated with positive parenting in the current study (i.e., amygdala, OFC, ACC) have been found in both adolescent and adult depression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reliability for some FreeSurfer delineated structures (particularly the amygdala and nucleus accumbens) is relatively low.

    “it has been suggested that reliability for some FreeSurfer delineated structures (particularly the amygdala and nucleus accumbens) is relatively low”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Positive parenting has been found to be associated with increased positive adolescent outcomes, and resilience against negative adolescent outcomes.

    “Given that positive parenting has been found to be associated with increased positive adolescent outcomes, and resilience against negative adolescent outcomes”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ellis, 2001, Revision of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire. 2001 Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development; Minneapolis, Minnesota
  2. Hops, 1995, Methodological issues in direct observation: illustration with the living in familial environments (life) coding system, J. Clin. Child Psychol., 24, 193, 10.1207/s15374424jccp2402_7 · DOI
  3. Lorenzetti, 2009, Structural brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a selective review of recent MRI studies, J. Affect. Disord., 117, 1, 10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.021 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Schwarz, 2012, Parental behaviors during family interactions predict changes in depression and anxiety during adolescence, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 40, 59, 10.1007/s10802-011-9542-2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Whittle, S., Simmons, J. G., Dennison, M., Vijayakumar, N., Schwartz, O., Yap, M. B. H., Sheeber, L., & Allen, N. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Allen, Nicholas B.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
8
Pages
7-17
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972771337
Cited by
279
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Colonial Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (350241)
  • Australian Research Council (DP0878136)
  • University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
positive parenting, maternal behavior, adolescent brain development, structural brain development, amygdala volume, cortical thinning, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, mother-adolescent interaction, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Hippocampus, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Parenting, Prefrontal Cortex, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review