Cited by 260Extraction and Separation ProcessesMembrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 235 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct lithium extraction: A new paradigm for lithium production and resource utilization

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.desal.2023.117249

Cites

234 of 234 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Baudino, 2022, Recent advances in the lithium recovery from water resources: from passive to electrochemical, Methods, 9, 2201380
  2. Razmjou, 2019, 10, 1
  3. Lundaev, 2022, 185, 107652
  4. Stringfellow, 2021, 14, 6805
  5. Li, 2019, 591, 117317
  6. Murphy, 2022, 4, 1008680
  7. Yang, 2000, Synthesis of Li1. 33Mn1. 67O4 spinels with different morphologies and their ion adsorptivities after delithiation, J. Mater. Chem., 10, 1903, 10.1039/b000219o · DOI
  8. Xu, 2021, Materials for lithium recovery from salt lake brine, J. Mater. Sci., 56, 16, 10.1007/s10853-020-05019-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Palsdottir, 2019, Supercritical fluid extraction of lithium from synthetic geothermal brines, Geotherm. Resour. Council Trans., 43
  10. Vera, 2023, Environmental impact of direct lithium extraction from brines, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1
  11. Davis, 1986, Origin of the lithium-rich brine, Clayton Valley, Nevada, U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull., 1622, 131
  12. Kavanagh, 2018, Global lithium sources—industrial use and future in the electric vehicle industry: a review, Resources, 7, 57, 10.3390/resources7030057 · DOI
  13. Wen, 2016, Selective ionic transport: highly selective ionic transport through subnanometer pores in polymer films (Adv. Funct. Mater. 32/2016), Adv. Funct. Mater., 26, 5947, 10.1002/adfm.201670209 · DOI
  14. Wang, 2018, Ultrafast ion sieving using nanoporous polymeric membranes, Nat. Commun., 9, 569, 10.1038/s41467-018-02941-6 · DOI
  15. Abraham, 2017, Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes, Nat. Nanotechnol., 12, 546, 10.1038/nnano.2017.21 · DOI
  16. Ren, 2015, Charge- and size-selective ion sieving through Ti3C2Tx MXene membranes, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 4026, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01895 · DOI
  17. Xu, 2020, Engineering leaf-like UiO-66-SO 3 H membranes for selective transport of cations, Nano Lett., 12, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Farahbakhsh, J., Arshadi, F., Mofidi, Z., Mohseni-Dargah, M., Kök, C., Assefi, M., Soozanipour, A., Zargar, M., Asadnia, M., Boroumand, Y., Presser, V., & Razmjou, A.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Leibniz-Institute for New Materials (DE)
  • University of Isfahan (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Presser, Volker
  • Razmjou, Amir
Venue
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
575
Pages
117249
ISSN
0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390245653
Cited by
260
References
235
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 42
FWCI
25.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Desalination (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Keywords
direct lithium extraction, lithium recovery, lithium brines, lithium ore, spent batteries, adsorption, ion exchange, membrane separation, direct carbonation, electrochemical extraction, lithium batteries, sustainable resource recovery, environmental impact, scalability, cost

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review