Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumers' decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation

Chen, Jun, Shen, Xiao-Liang·2015·Decision Support Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.012

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Zhang, 2012, The evolution of social commerce: an examination from the people, business, technology, and information perspective, Communications of the Associate for Information Systems, 31, 105
  2. G. C. Kane, M. Alavi, G. J. Labianca, S. P. Borgatti, L. Center, What's different about social media netoworks? a framework and research agenda, Management of Information System Quarterly.
  3. Zhou, 2013, Social commerce research: an integrated view, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, 61, 10.1016/j.elerap.2013.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zheng, 2013, The impacts of information quality and system quality on users' continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: an empirical investigation, Decision Support Systems, 56, 513, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Liang, 2011, What drives social commerce: the role of social support and relationship quality, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 69, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160204 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Li, 2013, A social recommender mechanism for e-commerce: combining similarity, trust, and relationship, Decision Support Systems, 55, 740, 10.1016/j.dss.2013.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Au Yeung, 2011, Strength of social influence in trust networks in product review sites, 495
  8. Stewart, 2003, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Organization Science, 14, 5, 10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Geyskens, 1996, The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: a transatlantic study, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 303, 10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00006-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Costa, 2003, Work team trust and effectiveness, Personnel Review, 32, 605, 10.1108/00483480310488360 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Li, 2006, Why do internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 105, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415100404 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wu, 2010, Trust factors influencing virtual community members: a study of transaction communities, Journal of Business Research, 63, 1025, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Shin, 2013, The effect of site quality on repurchase intention in internet shopping through mediating variables: the case of university students in South Korea, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 453, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lu, 2010, From virtual community members to c2c e-commerce buyers: trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers purchase intention, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 346, 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Shi, 2013, Leveraging social grouping for trust building in foreign electronic commerce firms: an exploratory study, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 419, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.001 · DOI
  16. Burt, 1995, Kinds of third-party effects on trust, Rationality and Society, 7, 255, 10.1177/1043463195007003003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wang, 2013, Transition of electronic word-of-mouth services from web to mobile context: a trust transfer perspective, Decision Support Systems, 54, 1394, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Chen, 2009, The role of mutual trust in building members' loyalty to a c2c platform provider, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14, 147, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415140105 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cobb, 1976, Social support as a moderator of life stress, Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300, 10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Schaefer, 1981, The health-related functions of social support, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 381, 10.1007/BF00846149 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Pfeil, 2009, Investigating social network patterns within an empathic online community for older people, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1139, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.001 · DOI
  22. Bateman, 2011, Research note the impact of community commitment on participation in online communities, Information Systems Research, 22, 841, 10.1287/isre.1090.0265 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Smith, 2011, Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review, MIS Quarterly, 35, 989, 10.2307/41409970 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Salo, 2007, A conceptual model of trust in the online environment, Online Information Review, 31, 604, 10.1108/14684520710832324 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Shen, 2014, Exploring online social behavior in crowdsourcing communities: a relationship management perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 144, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.006 · DOI
  26. Sussman, 2003, Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption, Information Systems Research, 14, 47, 10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wu, 2006, Effect of transaction trust on e-commerce relationships between travel agencies, Tourism Management, 27, 1253, 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.06.009 · DOI
  28. Maloney-Krichmar, 2005, A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 201, 10.1145/1067860.1067864 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Coulson, 2005, Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 580, 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.580 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ommen, 2008, Trust, social support and patient typeassociations between patients perceived trust, supportive communication and patients preferences in regard to paternalism, clarification and participation of severely injured patients, Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 196, 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.016 · DOI
  31. Porter, 2008, Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities, Management Science, 54, 113, 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Rhoades, 2001, Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825 · Paper page
  33. Lee, 2007, Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 661, 10.1002/job.431 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Bagozzi, 2006, Open source software user communities: a study of participation in linux user groups, Management Science, 52, 1099, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0545 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Cheung, 2010, A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks, Decision Support Systems, 49, 24, 10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Chang, 2011, Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: participant involvement as a moderator, Information Management, 48, 9, 10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Chow, 2008, Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing, Information Management, 45, 458, 10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sivo, 2006, How low should you go? Low response rates and the validity of inference in is questionnaire research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 351, 10.17705/1jais.00093 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Chin, 1998, Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22, vii
  40. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Baron, 1986, The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Qiu, 2013, Social network-embedded prediction markets: the effects of information acquisition and communication on predictions, Decision Support Systems, 55, 978, 10.1016/j.dss.2013.01.007 · DOI

Cited by

See all 493

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J., & Shen, X.-L.
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
79
Pages
55-64
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.012
OpenAlex
W2213022100
Cited by
493
References
14
FWCI
89.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (13YJC630132)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71202120, 71231007, 71301125)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers' decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.012
The paper
Chen, J., & Shen, X.-L. (2015). Consumers' decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.