Cited by 121Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Peritoneal fluid flow influences anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions: Why Sampson seems to be right

Bricou, Alexandre, Batt, Ronald E., Chapron, Charles·2008·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Endometriosis is a frequent pathology for which the dominant signs and symptoms are pelvic pain and infertility. The physiopathology remains the subject of controversy. Four physiopathological hypotheses have been put forward: regurgitation, metaplasia, induction and (vascular and lymphatic) embolization. The anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions would appear to be fundamental for a better understanding of Sampson's menstrual regurgitation theory of endometriosis. Analysis of the results in the literature and comparison with our experience clearly shows that the distribution of endometriotic lesions is asymmetrical in several respects. Abdominopelvic anatomy and peritoneal fluid flow can explain this asymmetrical distribution of endometriotic lesions in the great majority of cases. These observations are a very strong argument in favour of the crucial role played by tubal regurgitation and the peritoneal fluid in the physiopathology of endometriosis. The similarity in anatomical distribution of endometriomas, superficial and deeply invasive endometriotic lesions would tend to indicate a common origin for these different types of lesions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.014

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bricou, A., Batt, R. E., & Chapron, C.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Chapron, Charles
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
138
Issue
2
Pages
127-134
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2000333628
Cited by
121
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, endometrioma, superficial endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, endometriosis pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Ascitic Fluid, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Menstruation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review