Cited by 97Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo Effect

Parental catastrophizing about their child's chronic pain: are mothers and fathers different?

Open access
Hechler, Tanja, Vervoort, Tine, Hamann, Maximiliane, Tietze, Anna‐Lena, Vocks, Silja, Goubert, Liesbet, Hermann, Christiane, Wager, Julia +3 more·2011·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Preliminary evidence suggests that parental catastrophizing about their child's pain may be important in understanding both parental responses to their child's pain and the child's pain experience. However, little is known about potential differences between mothers and fathers. There were three aims of the present study addressing this lack of knowledge: (i) to investigate the three‐factor structure of the German version of the Parental Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS‐P) () in mothers and fathers of children with chronic pain, (ii) to explore differences between mothers and fathers in parental catastrophizing, (iii) to investigate the contribution of parental catastrophizing on the child's chronic pain problem and pain‐related parent behavior. In a sample of 128 mothers and fathers of paediatric chronic pain patients, the invariance of the PCS‐P was evaluated. Results replicated the previously established three‐factor structure (i.e. rumination, magnification and helplessness) in both groups. Mothers reported higher levels of catastrophizing as compared to fathers. Specifically, mothers and fathers differed on levels of rumination; the two groups did not differ in magnification and helplessness. Maternal but not paternal catastrophizing contributed significantly in explaining the child's pain intensity whereas neither mothers' nor fathers' catastrophizing were significantly related to the child's disability. Both maternal and paternal catastrophizing contributed significantly to heightened parental solicitous responses. Fathers' but not mothers' catastrophizing also contributed to heightened distracting responses. The present findings attest to the importance of maternal and paternal catastrophizing for the child's pain characteristics and pain‐related parent behavior, which are both relevant for treatment conceptualization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.09.015

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considerable evidence suggests that pain prevalence is greater in women than in men.

    “There is considerable evidence suggesting greater pain prevalence in women when compared to men 150, 152–154.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hechler, T., Vervoort, T., Hamann, M., Tietze, A., Vocks, S., Goubert, L., Hermann, C., Wager, J., Blankenburg, M., Schroeder, S., & Zernikow, B.
Affiliations
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
515.e1-9
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W1501979961
Cited by
96
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
pediatric chronic pain, parents, gender differences, rumination, magnification, helplessness, pain intensity, disability, measurement invariance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Child, Chronic Disease, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mothers, Pain, Pain Measurement, Parent-Child Relations, Sex Factors, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review