Cited by 319Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The relationship between type 2 diabetes and cognitive dysfunction: longitudinal studies and their methodological limitations

Allen, Kate V., Frier, Brian M., Strachan, Mark W.J.·2004·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes and dementia in the elderly are major public health problems. Cross-sectional studies have suggested that these two conditions may be inter-related, but the nature of this association is uncertain. Causation can only be established through studies with a longitudinal design, taking into account the many potential confounding factors in any study of cognition. A literature search has identified 10 studies (nine population-based and one of case-controlled design) that included a definable diabetic population and assessments of cognitive function at baseline and at follow-up. These 10 studies utilised a combination of domain-specific cognitive assessments and a clinical diagnosis of dementia in the assessment of cognitive function. Diabetes was associated with either an accelerated cognitive decline or an increased incidence of dementia in eight of nine of the population-based studies. One study demonstrated a relationship between diabetes and vascular cognitive impairment, but not with other types of dementia. No association between type 2 diabetes and cognitive decline was demonstrated in the case-controlled study. These studies provide compelling evidence to support the view that people with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of developing cognitive impairment in comparison with the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.02.054

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, K. V., Frier, B. M., & Strachan, M. W. J.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Strachan, Mark W.J.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
490
Issue
1-3
Pages
169-175
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021585613
Cited by
319
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cognitive impairment, dementia, cognitive decline, vascular cognitive impairment, dementia risk, longitudinal study, confounding factors, causality
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review