Cited by 91Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Atmospheric sulfur rearrangement 2.7 billion years ago: Evidence for oxygenic photosynthesis

Kurzweil, Florian, Claire, Mark, Thomazo, Christophe, Peters, Marc, Hannington, Mark, Strauss, Harald·2013·Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.01.028

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent studies suggest a more complex and dynamic evolution scenario for pO2.

    “More recent studies, most of which were driven by the emergence of redox-sensitive trace element proxies, suggest a more complex and dynamic evolution scenario for pO2 (7–11).”
  • The decrease in Δ33S values in the transitional interval was caused by an increase of pO2, which weakened the preservation of Δ33S signals from photochemistry through mixing different atmospheric sulfur pools, but this homogenization was incomplete.

    “we suggest that the decrease in Δ33S values in the transitional interval was caused by an increase of pO2, which weakened the preservation of Δ33S signals from photochemistry through mixing different atmospheric sulfur pools; however, this homogenization was incomplete (9, 25).”
  • The Δ36S/Δ33S slope of −0.9 is widespread in Neoarchean sedimentary rocks and interpreted to be of atmospheric origin.

    “This is also supported by the Δ36S/Δ33S slope of −0.9, which is widespread in Neoarchean sedimentary rocks and interpreted to be of atmospheric origin (9, 25, 30, 43).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurzweil, F., Claire, M., Thomazo, C., Peters, M., Hannington, M., & Strauss, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Kurzweil, Florian
Venue
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
366
Pages
17-26
ISSN
0012-821X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005976476
Cited by
91
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Str 281/30-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
oxygenic photosynthesis, Great Oxidation Event, Archean atmosphere, atmospheric oxygen, methane, Neoarchean, sulfur isotope fractionation, primary productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review