Cited by 103Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Changes in physicochemical properties and quality index of an Alfisol after three years of rice husk biochar amendment in rainfed rice – Maize cropping sequence

Oladele, Segun O.·2019·Geoderma

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.038

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oladele, S. O.
Affiliations
Federal University of Technology (NG)
Corresponding author
Oladele, Segun O.
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
353
Pages
359-371
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2958875089
Cited by
103
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoderma (publishedVersion)
Funders
Federal University of Technology Akure
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
rice husk biochar, Alfisol, soil quality index, soil physicochemical properties, rainfed rice, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, C/N ratio, cation exchange capacity, water-stable aggregates, water holding capacity, bulk density, soil electrical conductivity, carbon sequestration, nitrogen fluxes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review