Cited by 832Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Management and Crop Yield

Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition

Uzoma, K. C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Fujimaki, H., Zahoor, A., Nishihara, E.·2011·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we performed a greenhouse experiment to investigate the effect of cow manure biochar on maize yield, nutrient uptake and physico‐chemical properties of a dryland sandy soil. Biochar was derived from dry cow manure pyrolysed at 500 °C. Cow manure biochar was mixed with a sandy soil at the rate equivalent to 0, 10, 15 and 20 t biochar per hectare. Maize was used as a test crop. Results of the study indicated that cow manure biochar contains some important plant nutrients which significantly affected the maize crop growth. Maize yield and nutrient uptake were significantly improved with increasing the biochar mixing rate. Application of biochar at 15 and 20 t/ha mixing rates significantly increased maize grain yield by 150 and 98% as compared with the control, respectively. Maize net water use efficiency (WUE) increased by 6, 139 and 91% as compared with the control, with the 10, 15 and 20 t/ha mixing rate, respectively. Nutrient uptake by maize grain was significantly increased with higher biochar applications. Application of cow manure biochar improved the field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity of the sandy soil, as a result net WUE also increased. Results of the soil analysis after the harvesting indicated significant increase in the pH, total C, total N, Oslen‐P, exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity. The results of this study indicated that application of cow manure biochar to sandy soil is not only beneficial for crop growth but it also significantly improved the physico‐chemical properties of the coarse soil.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00340.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uzoma, K. C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Fujimaki, H., Zahoor, A., & Nishihara, E.
Affiliations
  • Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University (JP)
  • Tottori University (JP)
Corresponding author
Uzoma, K. C.
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-15
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
205-212
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W1739582900
Cited by
832
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
37.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
maize yield, sandy soil, arid soils, nutrient uptake, water use efficiency, soil hydraulic conductivity, soil physicochemical properties, soil amendment, pyrolysis, cation exchange capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review