Cited by 247Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Epicardial adipose tissue and cardiovascular diseases

Ansaldo, Anna Maria, Montecucco, Fabrizio, Sahebkar, Amirhossein, Dallegri, Franco, Carbone, Federico·2019·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Obesity is a heterogeneous disease with different degrees of cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic manifestations. Certain ectopic fat depots may contribute to obesity-related CV risk and may explain part of the risk differential observed in metabolically healthy obese and the so called "obesity paradox". The growing interest towards the potential impact of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in cardiovascular (CV) risk has led to deepen its biological function. Genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors may drive the shift towards a dysfunctional EAT characterized by a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotype. Due to the close anatomic proximity to coronary arteries, a thicker and dysfunctional EAT actively contribute to development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Beside classical paracrine transmission, EAT may directly release mediators into the vasa vasorum of the coronary arterial wall, a mechanism referred to as "vasocrine". Similarly, the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic secretome characterizing dysfunctional EAT may impair cardiac structure and function, thus being implicated in the pathogenesis of diastolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The development of 3D imaging techniques have paved the way for clarifying the causative role of EAT in CV pathophysiology, the use of EAT volume/thickness in CV risk stratification and potential cardio-protective effects of EAT reduction. The aim of this narrative review is to update current knowledge on the pathophysiological functions of EAT, focusing on basic mechanisms and potential clinical implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.089

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ansaldo, A. M., Montecucco, F., Sahebkar, A., Dallegri, F., & Carbone, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Genoa (IT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Carbone, Federico
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
278
Pages
254-260
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892528668
Cited by
247
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, ectopic fat, obesity, cardiovascular risk, metabolically healthy obesity, obesity paradox, coronary artery disease, vasa vasorum, inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, EAT thickness, cardiovascular risk stratification, 3D imaging
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Obesity, Pericardium, Inflammation Mediators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review