Cited by 605Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityAdipose Tissue and MetabolismAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Local and systemic effects of the multifaceted epicardial adipose tissue depot

Iacobellis, Gianluca·2015·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue is a unique and multifaceted fat depot with local and systemic effects. This tissue is distinguished from other visceral fat depots by a number of anatomical and metabolic features, such as increased fatty acid metabolism and a unique transcriptome enriched in genes that are associated with inflammation and endothelial function. Epicardial fat and the heart share an unobstructed microcirculation, which suggests these tissues might interact. Under normal physiological conditions, epicardial fat has metabolic, thermogenic (similar to brown fat) and mechanical (cardioprotective) characteristics. Development of pathological conditions might drive the phenotype of epicardial fat such that it becomes harmful to the myocardium and the coronary arteries. The equilibrium between protective and detrimental effects of this tissue is fragile. Expression of the epicardial-fat-specific transcriptome is downregulated in the presence of severe and advanced coronary artery disease. Improved local vascularization, weight loss and targeted medications can restore the protective physiological functions of epicardial fat. Measurements of epicardial fat have several important applications in the clinical setting: accurate measurement of its thickness or volume is correlated with visceral adiposity, coronary artery disease, the metabolic syndrome, fatty liver disease and cardiac changes. On account of this simple clinical assessment, epicardial fat is a reliable marker of cardiovascular risk and an appealing surrogate for assessing the efficacy of drugs that modulate adipose tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2015.58

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iacobellis, G.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Iacobellis, Gianluca
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2015-04-07
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
363-371
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W2059087651
Cited by
605
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 11
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, coronary artery disease, cardiometabolic disease, epicardial fat thickness, cardiovascular risk markers, fatty acid metabolism, thermogenesis, cardioprotection, inflammation, endothelial function, metabolic syndrome, hepatic steatosis, visceral fat
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Fatty Liver, Humans, Inflammation, Microcirculation, Pericardium, Risk Factors, Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, Abdominal, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review