Cited by 168Probiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and health

Exopolysaccharides produced by Bifidobacterium longum IPLA E44 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis IPLA R1 modify the composition and metabolic activity of human faecal microbiota in pH-controlled batch cultures

Salazar, Nuria, Ruas-Madiedo, Patricia, Kolida, Sofia, Collins, Michelle, Rastall, Robert, Gibson, Glenn, de los Reyes-Gavilán, Clara G.·2009·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

Exopolysaccharides (EPS) isolated from two Bifidobacterium strains, one of human intestinal origin (Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum IPLA E44) and the other from dairy origin (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis IPLA R1), were subjected to in vitro chemically simulated gastrointestinal digestion, which showed the absence of degradation of both polymers in these conditions. Polymers were then used as carbon sources in pH-controlled faecal batch cultures and compared with the non-prebiotic carbohydrate glucose and the prebiotic inulin to determine changes in the composition of faecal bacteria. A set of eight fluorescent in situ hybridisation oligonucleotide probes targeting 16S rRNA sequences was used to quantify specific groups of microorganisms. Growth of the opportunistic pathogen Clostridium histolyticum occurred with all carbohydrates tested similarly to that found in negative control cultures without added carbohydrate and was mainly attributed to the culture conditions used rather than enhancement of growth by these substrates. Polymers E44 and R1 stimulated growth of Lactobacillus/Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium, and Bacteroides/Prevotella in a similar way to that seen with inulin. The EPS R1 also promoted growth of the Atopobium cluster during the first 24h of fermentation. An increase in acetic and lactic acids was found during early stages of fermentation (first 10-24h) correlating with increases of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Atopobium. Propionic acid concentrations increased in old cultures, which was coincident with the enrichment of Clostridium cluster IX in cultures with EPS R1 and with the increases in Bacteroides in cultures with both microbial EPS (R1 and E44) and inulin. The lowest acetic to propionic acid ratio was obtained for EPS E44. None of the carbohydrates tested supported the growth of microorganisms from Clostridium clusters XIVa+b and IV, results that correlate with the poor butyrate production in the presence of EPS. Thus, EPS synthesized by bifidobacteria from dairy and intestinal origins can modulate the intestinal microbiota in vitro, promoting changes in some numerically and metabolically relevant microbial populations and shifts in the production of short chain fatty acids.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.08.017

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bifidobacterial exopolysaccharides have been proven to be capable of modulating gut microbiota in in vitro fecal batch cultures and in vivo mice trials.

    “Bifidobacterial molecules, such as the exopolysaccharides present in the outer cell-surface layer, have been proven to be capable of modulating gut microbiota in in vitro fecal batch cultures (55) and in vivo mice trials (56), thus providing a molecular basis for gut microbiota-bifidobacteria cross talk.”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [55]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition 125, 1401-1412. 504

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salazar, N., Ruas-Madiedo, P., Kolida, S., Collins, M., Rastall, R., Gibson, G., & de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
260-267
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047133493
Cited by
168
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
exopolysaccharides, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, human faecal microbiota, prebiotic activity, inulin, in vitro digestion, Clostridium histolyticum, Atopobium, Bacteroides-Prevotella, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate production, Clostridium cluster IV
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacteria, Bifidobacterium, Carboxylic Acids, Culture Media, Dairy Products, Digestion, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Feces, Female, Fermentation, Glucose, Humans, Intestines, Inulin, Male, Polymers, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, DNA Fingerprinting, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review