Cited by 55Information Systems Theories and ImplementationHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyUsability and User Interface Design

The need to move away from agential-AI: Empirical investigations, useful concepts and open issues

Open access
Cabitza, Federico, Campagner, Andrea, Simone, Carla·2021·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102696

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Simone, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • University of Siegen (DE)
Corresponding author
Campagner, Andrea
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
155
Pages
102696
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190833972
Cited by
55
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
human-AI interaction, knowledge artifacts, computer-supported cooperative work, group decision making, explainable AI, automation bias, deskilling, team decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review