The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 23 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
People analytics—A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions
Open accessAbstract
This mixed-method ‘scoping review’ mapped the emergence of the term People Analytics (PA), the value propositions offered by vendors of PA tools and services and the PA skillsets being sought by professionals. Analysis of academic research and online search traffic since 2002 revealed changes in the relative trajectory of PA and conceptually related terms over the past fifteen years, indicating both the re-branding of similar innovations and a differentiation of priorities and communities of practice. The market in commercial PA tools and services is diverse, offering numerous functional and strategic benefits, although published evidence of these outcomes remains sparse. Companies marketing PA systems and services emphasise benefits to employers more than to personnel. Across the sources examined, including specialised online courses, PA was largely aligned with HRM, however its development reflects the shifting focus of HR departments from supporting functional to strategic organisational requirements. Consideration of ethical issues was largely absent.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This scoping review maps the emergence of People Analytics (PA), vendor value propositions, and PA training using Google Trends, Scopus, vendor websites, and MOOCs. It finds PA terminology has diversified and rebranded since 2002, vendor claims emphasize employer benefits, empirical evidence for promised outcomes is sparse, and ethical issues are largely absent.
Key findings
- Analysis of academic research and online search traffic since 2002 revealed changes in the relative trajectory of PA and related terms over the past fifteen years, indicating both re-branding of similar innovations and differentiation of priorities and communities of practice. Google users began searching for People Analytics in 2005, and it overtook related terms in 2007; searches occurred in as many as 13 countries, with top terms varying by country (e.g., USA Human Capital Analytics, India Talent Analytics, Australia Workforce Analytics).
- The Scopus search yielded 58 relevant academic articles, almost all published in or after 2012; only three articles overlapped with Marler and Boudreau’s review (which shortlisted 14), while the HCA Group list encompassed 28 articles dating from 2002. Most publications came from Business, Management and Accounting, but technical disciplines were strongly represented in Scopus, and one fifth of recent Scopus articles were affiliated with IBM.
- All companies identified through online searches were either service providers or technology creators; their stated value propositions fell into overlapping categories: (A) better strategic decision making, (B) improved data handling, (C) improved people management, (D) new technological solutions, (E) direct impacts on HR or business outcomes, and (F) employee-oriented benefits. Companies marketing PA systems and services emphasised benefits to employers more than to personnel, and published evidence of these outcomes remained sparse.
- Only three MOOCs with relevant keywords were identified: two explicitly included PA, one used HR Analytics; all were introductory-level. Across sources, PA was largely aligned with HRM, and consideration of ethical issues was largely absent.
Methods
- Quasi-systematic scoping review following Arksey and O’Malley (2005), conducted in four phases: mapping PA-related terms via Google Trends; scoping academic research via Scopus (30/07/2017); scoping commercial PA tools and services via first-page Google results (30/07/2017); and scoping online training courses via the Wikipedia MOOC list (30/07/2017).
- Seven core keywords were refined after Phase 1: “HR analytics,” “Human Capital analytics,” “Human Resource analytics,” “People analytics,” “Talent analytics,” “Workforce analytics,” and “Employee analytics.” Analysis used open coding, benchmark lists from Marler and Boudreau and the HCA Group, Scimago journal classification, Isson and Harriott’s 7 PA pillars, Libert et al.’s vendor taxonomy, and the Nesta “Profile of a Perfect Data Analyst.”
Limitations
- The paper states that scoping reviews are exploratory and intended to provide insights rather than in-depth analysis; given rapid technological change, the review represents only a snapshot of the field to date. It also notes that the first page of Google results provides only a snapshot of the vendor ecosystem, that deeper iterative web searches and expert consultation would be valuable, that few empirical studies were found, that ethical considerations were largely absent, and that the HCA Group list was not systematically maintained.
- Evident from the text: vendor value propositions were drawn from online promotional narratives rather than independent evaluation; only three MOOCs were identified and course assessment was attempted without enrolling; and, consistent with scoping review design, included studies were not critically appraised for methodological quality.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
48 Own result · 19 Own interpretation · 10 No full text of the sources · 5 No basis given · 4 Own method · 3 Supported · 3 Sources not found · 2 Partly supported · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although lawyers, ethicists and management scientists are already addressing some of these issues (e.g.Bodie, Cherry, McCormick, & Tang, 2017;Dagnino, 2017;Pasquale, 2015)”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bodie, Cherry, McCormick, & Tang, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Dagnino, 2017 source
Dagnino’s discussion of workforce analytics identifies risks in using employee data for managerial decisions (La workforce analytics: i big data al lavoro). The concluding section explicitly calls for attention to both the current legal context and future ethical implications of people analytics (5. Note conclusive). This supports citing the paper as an example of scholarship already addressing some of these issues. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not matchedcites Pasquale, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although published evidence of these outcomes remains sparse”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Across the sources examined, including specialised online courses, PA was largely aligned with HRM”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Companies marketing PA systems and services emphasise benefits to employers more than to personnel.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analysis of academic research and online search traffic since 2002 revealed changes in the relative trajectory of PA and conceptually related terms over the past fifteen years”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consideration of ethical issues was largely absent.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two 'benchmark' lists did not have any article in common.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2. People analytics in published academic research 3.2.1. Comparison of search results with 'benchmark' lists
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“'Related words' used alongside the seven People Analytics search terms fell into several thematic clusters, based on our open coding (Appendix B).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.1. People analytics in online search trends
plainn = 7- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“almost all published in or after 2012.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2. People analytics in published academic research 3.2.1. Comparison of search results with 'benchmark' lists
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the last 10 years, the most popular terms have been People Analytics and HR Analytics”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Not specified
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“which highlighted the importance of HR data for effective management and organisational efficiency (Tursunbayeva, Bunduchi, Franco, & Pagliari, 2016).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Tursunbayeva, Bunduchi, Franco, & Pagliari, 2016 source
The Introduction says HR information systems provide leaders with crucial information for effective capacity planning and resource allocation. The Discussion adds that using HR information well can help create efficient health systems. Together, these passages support the claim in the health-care context. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Scoping reviews thus address broad rather than narrow research questions and seek to profile the literature and understand it holistically, rather than to critically appraise the methodological quality of individual studies (Holeman, Cookson, & Pagliari, 2016).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 2. Methods
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Holeman, Cookson, & Pagliari, 2016 source
The Methods, Study design section says scoping reviews often have broad research questions and map the landscape of evidence rather than formally assessing study quality. It also says they typically do not critically appraise study methodology, supporting the citing sentence’s contrast. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Scoping reviews are often used to examine emerging topics that are poorly understood, where research is at an early stage, or where pertinent knowledge is being generated outside academia.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 2. Methods
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Arksey and O'Malley (2005) source
The “What is a scoping study?” section describes scoping studies as useful for mapping complex or previously unreviewed areas, assessing whether research exists, and identifying gaps in the evidence base. The “Existing networks, relevant organisations and conferences” and “Framework Optional Stage: Consultation Exercise” sections describe finding unpublished work through organisations and gaining insights from practitioners and other stakeholders. Together, these support the citing sentence as a broad paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Supportedcites Holeman, Cookson, & Pagliari, 2016 source
The Methods (Study design) says scoping reviews are used to map nascent or scattered areas where academic database searches may be less fruitful. Its Table 2 says they map both peer-reviewed research and gray literature, supporting the point about knowledge generated outside academia. The Results (Limitations) likewise describes their use for emerging areas. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“PA promises to help organisations understand their workforce as a whole, as departments or work groups, and as individuals, by making data about employee attributes, behaviour and performance more accessible, interpretable and actionable (Pape, 2016).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Pape, 2016 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.1 (p. 9) describes analyses of employee performance and headcount, while section 4.2 (p. 10) says analyses can be broken down by location, role, department and manager. Appendix A (p. 13) includes decisions about individual employees. These passages support using HR analytics to understand the workforce at several levels, but they do not establish the claim that it makes employee data more accessible and interpretable. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The market in commercial PA tools and services is diverse, offering numerous functional and strategic benefits”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Searches for Human Capital Analytics appeared and rose from 2004”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Not specified
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These keywords included: HR Analytics and Human Resource Analytics; Information Systems including Human Resource Information Systems; and generic HR terms such as Human Resource or Human Resource Management.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Not specified
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marler and Boudreau, 2017 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“indeed one fifth of recent articles found in Scopus are affiliated with IBM”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2.2. Disciplinary focus
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with our Scopus search terms was Human Capital, reflecting the focus of the HCA group.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Not specified
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, this enabled us to identify a more comprehensive set of search terms than we had previously been aware of”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most significantly, technical disciplines such as the computing and mathematical sciences are strongly represented in Scopus and somewhat in Marler and Boudreau's lists but absent in the HCA group's list.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2.2. Disciplinary focus
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using our targeted search terms in Scopus yielded only studies published after 2008, whilst the HCA group's list goes back to 2002.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2.2. Disciplinary focus
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and of including emerging terms such as “Human Capital Data”, “Human Resource data”, “Talent data”, “Workforce data”, “Analytics in HR”, “HR metrics”, “HR predictive analytics”, “Collaboration Analytics”, “People Intelligence”, “Labor Analytics” and “Relationship Analytics”.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of the companies identified through our online searches are either service providers or technology creators.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.4. Business value offered by PA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Google users began searching for People Analytics in 2005”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Not specified
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most popular keywords specified in articles derived from our Scopus search results were: Workforce Analytics; HR Analytics; Human Resource Management; People Analytics; and Human Resource Analytics.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2.3. Search terms and authors' keywords represented in published articles
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All three are introductory-level courses, explaining how PA can be used for diverse HRM practices (see Table 3).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.4. People analytics courses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The openly accessible information describing MOOC is sufficient to assess their learning objectives.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While our broader scoping analysis reveals similar objectives, we note that vendors such as Accenture, IBM and QuestionPRO have begun to extend this to improvements in employee experience and satisfaction.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.6. Working definition
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The following overlapping categories of promised benefit emerged from the qualitative analysis of vendors' online marketing narratives:”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Stated value proposition:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Vendors' online promotional narratives accurately represent the value propositions of their PA tools and services.
In the paper
“PA technology vendors offer IT systems for achieving these aims by making workforce intelligence and predictive analytics more accessible, thus supporting strategic decision making and improving business outcomes, reflecting the vision of 'actionable analytics' (Dykes, 2016).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.4. Business value offered by PA
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dykes, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In practice, many of these terms are being used interchangeably, both by academics and vendors, although some practitioners align HR analytics with conventional HR and PA with a broader range of enterprise-level and strategic analytics (Van Vulpen, 2016).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.1. Terminological trends
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Van Vulpen, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“some of which are covert or reach beyond the boundaries of organisations themselves.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It also demonstrated the importance of widening searches beyond academic databases to uncover relevant grey literature”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the top search terms were, in the USA Human Capital Analytics, in India Talent Analytics and in Australia Workforce Analytics, while searches in the UK were more evenly spread across terms.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.1. People analytics in online search trends
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cross-referencing vendors' stated solutions with the coded articles in our review revealed some overlap in vision and intentions, but little evidence of the benefits promised.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.4. Business value offered by PA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Vendors' online promotional narratives accurately represent the value propositions of their PA tools and services.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the academic articles and PA courses included in our review approach PA as a sub-field of HR, which was also reflected in the headline curricula of the three MOOC.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.2. Affiliation and disciplinary focus
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These included studies that focused on: collaborations (e.g.studying work patterns from employees' collaboration activities); diversity and inclusion (e.g.understanding how demographic factors and workforce composition can affect individual, team or organisational performance); People Risks (e.g.quantifying human risks and reviewing existing risk measures); and inter-organisational relationships (”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2.4. PA objectives/practices represented in the articles
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Academic articles specific to PA emerged only in the last two years and this is now the most popular of the relevant terms according to Google Trends, closely followed by HR Analytics.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.1. Terminological trends
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results of our scoping review demonstrate the emergence of the term People Analytics and related concepts over the last 15 years, both within academic research and in online searches.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4. Discussion
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The most popular objectives and practices, based on Isson and Harriot's 7 pillars model, were performance assessment and development and employee lifetime values; onboarding, culture fit, and engagement, and workforce planning.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.3. Objectives of PA
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Isson and Harriot's 7 pillars model
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“indicating both the re-branding of similar innovations and a differentiation of priorities and communities of practice”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite this potential, PA is still not well understood in the business or academic communities (Marler & Boudreau, 2017) beyond HR innovators, or in high-risk sectors such as defence and financial services, where such practices are often shrouded in commercial secrecy.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marler & Boudreau, 2017 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With advances in privacy regulations, such as recently enforced European General Data Protection Directive, PA practitioners may soon have to re-think some of these approaches.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other recent trends include the use of linked employee data and analytics as a substitute for conventional psychometric testing in the acquisition and management of talent”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.3. Objectives of PA
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the meantime, the growth in professional conferences focused on PA (e.g. the Wharton People Analytics Conference or HR Analytics India Summit 2017) indicates the desire, primarily amongst international HR professionals, to fill this gap.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.5. PA skills being sought
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since PA is an emergent topic it was appropriate to use this broad approach rather than concentrating on a narrow and likely unrepresentative academic research literature and specific and narrow research questions.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 2. Methods
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The emergence of these categories illustrates the rapid development and diversification of the field, as already discussed with reference to terminologies and disciplines.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.3. Objectives of PA
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Manual inspection of the pre-and post-2008 publications suggests that PA emerged from organisational psychology and psychometrics but has since been marked by a trend towards the computing and data sciences.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.2.2. Disciplinary focus
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the rapid pace of technological change, this represents only a snapshot of the field to date.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They also suggest a re-branding of similar concepts by successive practitioner cohorts and vendors, as they seek to differentiate their knowledge, services or products in a competitive market.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.1. Terminological trends
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the increasing inclusion of PA within university curricula on business and management (e.g. the HR Analytics and Research course from the University of Denver, USA), along with new programmes in data science (e.g. the MSc in Data Science, Technology and Innovation from the University of Edinburgh, UK), and the emergence of other relevant online courses (e.g.People Analytics training”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.5. PA skills being sought
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To check the inclusivity of our search results, the titles of articles judged to be relevant were cross-referenced with those appearing in two benchmark literature sources”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 2.2. Scoping relevant academic research (Addresses objectives 1 and 2)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first page of Google results arising from each key search term provides only a snapshot of the vendor ecosystem.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“An increasing emphasis on measuring people risks (Marsh Risk Consulting, 2017) via analytics is also noteworthy, including not only conventional risks such as staff attrition, organisational reputation or customer safety, but also new forms of cyber-risk for which these new methods are well-suited, such as hack vulnerability or data theft (e.g.Royal & Windsor, 2016).”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.3. Objectives of PA
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Marsh Risk Consulting, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Royal & Windsor, 2016 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Internet cluster seems to be unique to the People Analytics keyword, suggesting that the scope of the PA concept extends beyond internal HR processes and practices.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.1. People analytics in online search trends
hedgedcorrelationaln = 7- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Examples include the monitoring of personal social media or email activity, which have implications for privacy”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our analysis of the PA-associated terms used in academic sources and in Google searches reveals an evolving and diversifying field originating in the traditional HRM profession (historically influenced by industrial psychology), through a critical period of innovation in digital infrastructure, technologies and analytical capabilities, reflecting broader trends in the digital economy over the”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.1. Terminological trends
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For our analysis we included only the organic results (Ratliff & Rubinfeld, 2014), and omitted paid advertisements.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 2.3. Scoping commercial PA tools and services (Addresses objectives 2 and 3)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ratliff & Rubinfeld, 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Vendors' online promotional narratives accurately represent the value propositions of their PA tools and services.
“We then reviewed the narrarative in vendors' online promotional material, to identify the specified or implied benefits offered to prospective purchasers (value proposition).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The openly accessible information describing MOOC is sufficient to assess their learning objectives.
“After examining the openly accessible information describing each course, we extracted those most closely related to PA and attempted to assess their learning objectives, insofar as this was possible without enrolling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People analytics is an emerging area.
“the intention here was to provide insights about this emerging area”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“few are meaningfully engaging with the important ethical challenges and risks these present for employees' privacy, autonomy and future work opportunities (Tursunbayeva et al., 2018).”
From The ethics of people analytics: risks, opportunities and recommendations (2022) · cites this paper as Tursunbayeva et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“there has been little academic research on the topic of PA, despite the mushrooming market penetration of vendor solutions and widespread corporate interest in engaging with these innovations.”
From The ethics of people analytics: risks, opportunities and recommendations (2022) · cites this paper as Tursunbayeva et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Our analysis indicates that discussion of ethical issues in PA has appeared in the academic and grey literature mainly (although not extensively) in the last three yearsmore than a decade after the first PA articles were published (Tursunbayeva et al., 2018).”
From The ethics of people analytics: risks, opportunities and recommendations (2022) · cites this paper as Tursunbayeva et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Currently, in HR Analytics, algorithmic HRM primarily augments HRM decision-making in that human decision makers may choose not to act on algorithmic-enabled insights or choose alternatives that are not necessarily predicted to be optimal by an algorithm (Rasmussen & Ulrich, 2015;Tursunbayeva et al., 2018).”
From Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM (2021) · cites this paper as Tursunbayeva et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.1. Terminological trends
“Google searches for one or more of our key terms took place in as many as 13 countries”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 5. Conclusions, caveats and recommendations
“Country UK USA India Australia Canada Other countries HR Analytics 20 20 68 21 20 Singapore (100) Netherlands (59) Brazil (2) Germany (10) Spain (8) UAE (40) Philippines (30) People Analytics 51 44 27 43 50 Singapore (100) Netherlands (40) South Africa (27) Brazil (19) Germany (17) Spain (11) Poland (3)”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 3.4. People analytics courses
“Two explicitly include the term PA, both originating from universities, one in Russia and one in the USA.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.5. PA skills being sought
“only three such courses, only one of which was explicitly labelled as "People analytics"”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > 4.4. Business value offered by PA
“All of the companies identified through our online searches are either service providers or technology creators.”
§ People analytics-A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions ☆ > Not specified
“| Network orchestrators | | | | | | | | | | | TechTarget | | | | + | + | | | | |”
Citations
Cites
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203793206-1 · Cited by 8,403
Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics
Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007 · Cited by 4,226
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
(2016) · Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306116641409c · Cited by 1,334
The use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review
Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., & Murugiah, K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 · Cited by 1,086
An evidence-based review of HR Analytics
Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699 · Cited by 913
HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge
Angrave, D., Charlwood, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Lawrence, M., & Stuart, M. (2016) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12090 · Cited by 633
Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research
Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006 · Cited by 599 · cited 1×
“Although most organisational theorists and leaders now recognise organisations as complex adaptive socio-technical systems (Schneider & Somers, 2006) interest in using data analytics and visualisation tools to render this complexity into a more comprehensible and actionable forms is growing…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Libert, 2016, Why are we still classifying companies by industry?, Harvard Business Review
- Massey, 2017, People Analytics, Coursera, 2017
- Pagliari, 2018, People analytics – pathway to organisational enlightenment or ethical minefield? Professional development workshop, British Academy of Management Conference
- Scimago Journal Ranking Portal, 2017. Scimago Journal & Country Rank.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics
Gal, U., Jensen, T. B., & Stein, M.-K. (2020) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100301 · Cited by 342
The dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organisations and employees
Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., & Redzepi, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1927213 · Cited by 331
Pessach, D., Singer, G., Avrahami, D., Chalutz Ben-Gal, H., Shmueli, E., & Ben-Gal, I. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113290 · Cited by 304
Meijerink, J., Boons, M., Keegan, A., & Marler, J. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1925326 · Cited by 267
Tackling the HR digitalization challenge: key factors and barriers to HR analytics adoption
Fernandez, V., & Gallardo-Gallardo, E. (2021) · Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal · doi:10.1108/cr-12-2019-0163 · Cited by 225
When technology meets people: the interplay of artificial intelligence and human resource management
Qamar, Y., Agrawal, R., Samad, T. A., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-11-2020-0436 · Cited by 217
Multimodal data as a means to understand the learning experience
Giannakos, M. N., Sharma, K., Pappas, I. O., Kostakos, V., & Velloso, E. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.003 · Cited by 227
Shet, S. V., Poddar, T., Wamba, S. F., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.054 · Cited by 259
The ethics of people analytics: risks, opportunities and recommendations
Tursunbayeva, A., Pagliari, C., Di Lauro, S., & Antonelli, G. (2022) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-12-2019-0680 · Cited by 193
Self-citationBridging the gap: why, how and when HR analytics can impact organizational performance
McCartney, S., & Fu, N. (2022) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-12-2020-1581 · Cited by 173
Chang, Y.-L., & Ke, J. (2023) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843231200930 · Cited by 181
From Big Data to Deep Data to Support People Analytics for Employee Attrition Prediction
Yahia, N. B., Hlel, J., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3074559 · Cited by 104
Human resource analytics: a review and bibliometric analysis
Qamar, Y., & Samad, T. A. (2021) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-04-2020-0247 · Cited by 162
Falletta, S. V., & Combs, W. L. (2021) · Journal of Work-Applied Management · doi:10.1108/jwam-03-2020-0020 · Cited by 110
The lifecycle of algorithmic decision-making systems: Organizational choices and ethical challenges
Marabelli, M., Newell, S., & Handunge, V. R. (2021) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101683 · Cited by 140
Artificial intelligence in health‐care: implications for the job design of healthcare professionals
Tursunbayeva, A., & Renkema, M. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12325 · Cited by 128
Self-citationGierlich-Joas, M., Heß, T., & Neuburger, R. (2020) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00130-0 · Cited by 112
Adoption of artificial intelligence: a TOP framework-based checklist for digital leaders
Tursunbayeva, A., & Chalutz-Ben Gal, H. (2024) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.006 · Cited by 102
Self-citationTursunbayeva, A. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4068-3 · Cited by 92
Self-citationHuman Resources Analytics for Public Personnel Management: Concepts, Cases, and Caveats
Cho, W., Choi, S., & Choi, H. (2023) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13020041 · Cited by 163
Promise versus reality: a systematic review of the ongoing debates in people analytics
McCartney, S., & Fu, N. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-01-2021-0013 · Cited by 106
Exploring the Evolution of Human Resource Analytics: A Bibliometric Study
Bonilla-Chaves, E. F., & Palos‐Sánchez, P. R. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13030244 · Cited by 116
Edwards, M. R., Charlwood, A., Guenole, N., & Marler, J. (2024) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12435 · Cited by 66
Trends in the thematic landscape of HR analytics research: a structural topic modeling approach
Thakral, P., Srivastava, P. R., Dash, S. S., Jasimuddin, S. M., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2023-0080 · Cited by 75
Communications of the Association for Information SystemsPreprint
Marabelli, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5250701 · Cited by 60
A critical review of HR analytics: visualization and bibliometric analysis approach
Arora, M., Prakash, A., Dixit, S., Mittal, A., & Singh, S. (2022) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-05-2022-0038 · Cited by 70
Li-jun, W., Zhou, Y., Sanders, K., Marler, J. H., & Zou, Y. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114312 · Cited by 97
Wehrle, M., Lechler, S., von der Gracht, H. A., & Hartmann, E. (2020) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12259 · Cited by 56
Towards a process-oriented understanding of HR analytics: implementation and application
Wirges, F., & Neyer, A. (2022) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00574-0 · Cited by 81
Insider econometrics meets people analytics and strategic human resource management
Larsson, A.-S., & Edwards, M. R. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1847166 · Cited by 61
Negt, P., & Haunschild, A. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00397-7 · Cited by 82
Help me help you: How HR analytics forecasts foster organizational creativity
Di Prima, C., Cepel, M., Kotaskova, A., & Ferraris, A. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123540 · Cited by 46
Mahade, A., Elmahi, A., Alomari, K. M., & Abdalla, A. A. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01114-y · Cited by 96
Mozaffari, F., Rahimi, M., Yazdani, H. R., & Sohrabi, B. (2022) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-11-2021-0664 · Cited by 41
Human resources analytics: where do we go from here?
Bahuguna, P. C., Srivastava, R., & Tiwari, S. (2023) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-06-2022-0401 · Cited by 60
Conte, F., & Siano, A. (2023) · Corporate Communications An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ccij-02-2022-0012 · Cited by 53
Predicting employee absenteeism for cost effective interventions
Lawrance, N., Petrides, G., & Guerry, M.-A. (2021) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113539 · Cited by 40
Quantifying human resource management: a literature review
Coron, C. (2022) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-05-2020-0322 · Cited by 40
Human Resources Analytics: A systematic Review from a Sustainable Management Approach
Álvarez‐Gutiérrez, F. J., Stone, D. L., Castaño, A. M., & Izquierdo, A. L. G. (2022) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.5093/jwop2022a18 · Cited by 75
Yoon, S. W., Han, S., & Chae, C. (2023) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843231209362 · Cited by 53
Lee, J. Y., & Lee, Y. (2024) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843231217181 · Cited by 38
Met the expectations? A meta-analysis of the performance consequences of digital HRM
Theres, C., & Strohmeier, S. (2023) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2022.2161324 · Cited by 58
Kiran, P. R., Chaubey, A., & Shastri, R. K. (2023) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-06-2023-0412 · Cited by 55
Military Applications of Machine Learning: A Bibliometric Perspective
Galán-Hernández, J. J., Carrasco, R. A., & LaTorre, A. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10091397 · Cited by 50
Jiang, Y., & Akdere, M. (2021) · Industrial and Commercial Training · doi:10.1108/ict-04-2021-0028 · Cited by 27
Identifying the enablers of HR digitalization and HR analytics using ISM and MICMAC analysis
Verma, S., Rana, N., & Meher, J. R. (2023) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-01-2023-3611 · Cited by 42
Mental well-being through HR analytics: investigating an employee supportive framework
Lathabhavan, R. (2023) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-11-2022-0836 · Cited by 37
Addressing impediments to HR analytics adoption: guide to HRD professionals
Dasari, S. R., & Devi, V. R. (2023) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2023.2195986 · Cited by 45
HR analytics-as-practice: a systematic literature review
Espegren, Y., & Hugosson, M. (2023) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-11-2022-0345 · Cited by 57
Prima, C. D., Kotásková, A., Yildiz, H., & Ferraris, A. (2023) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2023-0973 · Cited by 30
Turning fragments into a lens: Technological change, industrial revolutions, and labor
Didier, N. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102497 · Cited by 40
People Analytics im Personalmanagement: Auf dem Weg zur automatisierten Entscheidungskultur?
Kels, P., & Vormbusch, U. (2020) · Industrielle Beziehungen Zeitschrift für Arbeit Organisation und Management · doi:10.3224/indbez.v27i1.04 · Cited by 27
Remote Work at the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Scoping Review
Tursunbayeva, A., Lauro, S. D., & Antonelli, G. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7099-2_6 · Cited by 28
Self-citationPeople Analytics Enabling HR Strategic Partnership: A Review
Suri, N., & Lakhanpal, P. (2022) · South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management · doi:10.1177/23220937221119599 · Cited by 46
Rigamonti, E., Gastaldi, L., & Mariano Corso, A. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-11-2023-2087 · Cited by 44
(How) do advanced data and analyses enable HR analytics success? A neo-configurational analysis
Strohmeier, S., Collet, J., & Kabst, R. (2022) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-05-2021-0188 · Cited by 28
Handa, A., Maini, R., & Sharma, V. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7057-6.ch008 · Cited by 23
Ontrup, G., Schempp, P. S., & Kluge, A. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-03-2021-0064 · Cited by 25
Baakeel, O. A. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering · doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/9891.12020 · Cited by 21
Karmańska, A. M. (2020) · Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu · doi:10.15611/pn.2020.8.03 · Cited by 26
Smart human resource analytics for happiness management
Abellán-Sevilla, A.-J., & Ortiz‐de‐Urbina‐Criado, M. (2023) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-03-2023-0064 · Cited by 28
Vilaplana, F., & Stein, G. (2020) · Revista Empresa y Humanismo · doi:10.15581/015.xxiii.1.113-137 · Cited by 20
Mushtaq, N., Manjiang, X., Bakhtawar, A., & Mufti, M. A. (2024) · Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management · doi:10.47297/wspchrmwsp2040-800501.20241502 · Cited by 25
Data-Driven Decision Making: Application of People Analytics in Human Resource Management
Stankevičiūtė, Ž. (2024) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55952-5_12 · Cited by 24
Kiu, T. C. T., & Chan, J. H. (2023) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-07-2023-0430 · Cited by 26
Poba-Nzaou, P., Uwizeyemunugu, S., Gaha, K., & Laberge, M. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-06-2018-0150 · Cited by 6
Machine Learning Based Solutions for Human Resource Systems Management
Kumar, M. R., & Gunjan, V. K. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7985-8_129 · Cited by 16
The Evaluation of the Black Box Problem for AI-Based Recommendations: An Interview-Based Study
Ochmann, J., Zilker, S., & Laumer, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_16 · Cited by 18
Past as prologue: Taylorism, the new scientific management and managing human capital
Birnbaum, D., & Somers, M. J. (2022) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-01-2022-3106 · Cited by 25
Post-COVID-19 ethics of people analytics
Bryce, V., McBride, N. K., & Cunden, M. (2022) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-09-2021-0096 · Cited by 17
Kizilcec, R. F., & Davis, D. (2023) · Advances in analytics for learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27646-0_8 · Cited by 15
Hota, J. (2021) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/09722629211029007 · Cited by 19
BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF HR ANALYTICS LITERATURE
Allaham, M. V. (2022) · Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.17755/esosder.950426 · Cited by 17
Ebrahimi, S., & Matt, C. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962231181148 · Cited by 14
Regimes of justification in the datafied workplace: The case of hiring
Dencik, L., & Stevens, S. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211052893 · Cited by 19
Human Resource Management Practices in the Age of Industrial Automation
Praba, K., Vijay, B., Abuya, J. O., Poreddy, D., Mulakala, S., & Manoharan, S. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5380-6.ch004 · Cited by 11
Di Lauro, S., Tursunbayeva, A., Antonelli, G., & Moschera, L. (2025) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-11-2023-0927 · Cited by 12
Self-citationTowards an Understanding of Data’s Influence on Leadership
Gierlich-Joas, M., & Heß, T. (2020) · doi:10.30844/wi_2020_q3-gierlich · Cited by 10
ENHANCING TEXTILE QUALITY CONTROL WITH IOT SENSORS: A CASE STUDY OF AUTOMATED DEFECT DETECTION
Md Morshedul Islam, A. A. M. &. A. S. M. S. (2024) · GLOBAL MAINSTREAM JOURNAL · doi:10.62304/ijmisds.v1i1.113 · Cited by 10
Anthun, K. S., Anthun, K. S., Håland, E., & Lillefjell, M. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11610-y · Cited by 22
Human Resource Management Using Machine Learning-Based Solutions
Kumar, M. R., Sharma, A., Krishna Bhargavi, Y., & Ramesh, G. (2022) · International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC) · doi:10.1109/icesc54411.2022.9885526 · Cited by 10
Tursunbayeva, A., & Lauro, S. D. (2022) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.3569 · Cited by 11
Self-citationBottesch, S., Schwenke, C., Förster, M., & Klier, M. (2025) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-025-00842-3 · Cited by 19
Decentralized Inverse Transparency with Blockchain
Zieglmeier, V., Daiqui, G. L., & Pretschner, A. (2023) · Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3592624 · Cited by 9
Organizational Adoption Factors of HR Analytics: A Practitioner’s Perspective
Dasari, S. R., & Devi, V. R. (2024) · Management and Labour Studies · doi:10.1177/0258042x241249244 · Cited by 21
Espegren, Y. (2024) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-03-2024-0219 · Cited by 13
Increasing Employees’ Willingness to Share: Introducing Appeal Strategies for People Analytics
Zieglmeier, V., Gierlich-Joas, M., & Pretschner, A. (2022) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_15 · Cited by 8
Rigamonti, E., Colaiacovo, B., Gastaldi, L., & Mariano Corso, A. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-06-2023-0246 · Cited by 15
Organizational and Corporate Identity on Social Media: A Literature Review
Lauro, S. D., Tursunbayeva, A., Antonelli, G., & Martinez, M. (2020) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v15n4p53 · Cited by 8
Self-citationHuman resource analytics adoption: a framework-based analysis, fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy SWARA
malekinezhad, M. K., Rahimnia, F., Eslami, G., & Farahi, M. M. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Management Research · doi:10.1108/jamr-05-2024-0181 · Cited by 14
Kurikala, V., & Parvathi, V. (2023) · Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management · doi:10.47297/wspchrmwsp2040-800503.20231401 · Cited by 12
Zheng, T., & Sikora, R. T. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114477 · Cited by 6
Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Futures
Samanvitha, C., Dharmendra, H., Nethravathi, N., & Velmurugan, P. R. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5380-6.ch006 · Cited by 6
From data to knowledge in four decades: a systematic literature review of human resource analytics
Ioakeimidou, D., Symeonidis, S., Chatzoudes, D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2025) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2025.2465236 · Cited by 7
The IT Artifact in People Analytics: Reviewing Tools to Understand a Nascent Field
Hüllmann, J. A., Krebber, S., & Troglauer, P. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_18 · Cited by 7
Enhance employee productivity using Talent analytics and Visualization
Raguvir, S., & Babu, S. (2020) · International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI) · doi:10.1109/icdabi51230.2020.9325682 · Cited by 6
Towards Minimising Timestamp Usage In Application Software
Burkert, C., & Federrath, H. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31500-9_9 · Cited by 6
Vanhove, A. J., Graham, B. Z., Titareva, T., & Udomvisawakul, A. (2025) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.70012 · Cited by 6
HR 4.0: Role of AI in transforming HRM
Yadav, P. V., Kollimath, U. S., Giramkar, S. A., Pisal, D. T., Badave, S. S., & Swamy, S. M. (2023) · International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA) · doi:10.1109/esmarta59349.2023.10293704 · Cited by 11
Gierlich-Joas, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_38 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Tursunbayeva, A., Di Lauro, S., & Pagliari, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Molise (IT)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tursunbayeva, Aizhan
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 224-247
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889180445
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- HSBC Bank USA
- Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
- Research Councils UK
- University of Edinburgh
- Università degli Studi del Molise
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L007487/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
- Keywords
- HR analytics, value proposition, human resource management, strategic human resource management, conceptual boundaries, employer benefits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-03, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-03 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
