Cited by 314SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Low-Avidity CD4+ T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Unexposed Individuals and Humans with Severe COVID-19

Open access
Bacher, Petra, Rosati, Elisa, Esser, Daniela, Martini, Gabriela Rios, Saggau, Carina, Schiminsky, Esther, Dargvainiene, Justina, Schröder, Ina +19 more·2020·Immunity

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

CD4+ T cells reactive against SARS-CoV-2 can be found in unexposed individuals, and these are suggested to arise in response to common cold coronavirus (CCCoV) infection. Here, we utilized SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cell enrichment to examine the antigen avidity and clonality of these cells, as well as the relative contribution of CCCoV cross-reactivity. SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ memory T cells were present in virtually all unexposed individuals examined, displaying low functional avidity and multiple, highly variable cross-reactivities that were not restricted to CCCoVs. SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells from COVID-19 patients lacked cross-reactivity to CCCoVs, irrespective of strong memory T cell responses against CCCoV in all donors analyzed. In severe but not mild COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells displayed low functional avidity and clonality, despite increased frequencies. Our findings identify low-avidity CD4+ T cell responses as a hallmark of severe COVID-19 and argue against a protective role for CCCoV-reactive T cells in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.016

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Anft M. Paniskaki K. Blazquez-Navarro A. Doevelaar A.A.N. Seibert F. Hoelzer B. Skrzypczyk S. Kohut E. Kurek J. Zapka J. COVID-19 progression is potentially driven by T cell immunopathogenesis medRxiv 2020 2020.2004.2028.20083089
  2. Meckiff B.J. Ramirez-Suastegui C. Fajardo V. Chee S.J. Kusnadi A. Simon H. Eschweiler S. Grifoni A. Pelosi E. Weiskopf D. Imbalance of regulatory and cytotoxic SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in COVID-19 Cell 183 2020 1 14 33096020 PMC7534589
  3. Wilk A.J. Rustagi A. Zhao N.Q. Roque J. Martínez-Colón G.J. McKechnie J.L. Ivison G.T. Ranganath T. Vergara R. Hollis T. A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19 Nat. Med. 26 2020 1070 1076 32514174 PMC7382903

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacher, P., Rosati, E., Esser, D., Martini, G. R., Saggau, C., Schiminsky, E., Dargvainiene, J., Schröder, I., Wieters, I., Khodamoradi, Y., Eberhardt, F., Vehreschild, M. J. G. T., Neb, H., Sonntagbauer, M., Conrad, C., Tran, F., Rosenstiel, P., Markewitz, R., Wandinger, K.-P., Augustin, M., Rybniker, J., Kochanek, M., Leypoldt, F., Cornely, O. A., Koehler, P., Franke, A., & Scheffold, A.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
  • Klinik Preetz (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Venue
Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
1258-1271.e5
ISSN
1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108728530
Cited by
314
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Shionogi
  • Novartis
  • Roche
  • Bayer
  • Miltenyi Biotec
  • Meso Scale Diagnostics
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG 433038070, DFG 4096610003, RU5042-miTarget)
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Biogen
  • Basilea Pharmaceutica
  • 3M
  • Universität zu Köln
  • Merck KGaA
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GM1908A, LE3064/2-1, 03ZZ0838B, 01KX2021)
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  • Paul Scherrer Institut
  • Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, CD4+ T cells, T cell avidity, T cell clonality, cross-reactivity, memory T cells, severe COVID-19, T cell response
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Antigens, Viral, Cells, Cultured, Cross Reactions, Environmental Exposure, Humans, Immunologic Memory, Lymphocyte Activation, Protein Binding, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Rhinovirus, Severity of Illness Index, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Disease Progression, T-Cell Antigen Receptor Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review