Cited by 147Ionic liquids properties and applicationsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced extraction of phenolic compounds using choline chloride based deep eutectic solvents from Juglans regia L.

Open access

Abstract

The extraction of phenolic compounds from walnut leaves (Juglans regia L.) was optimized using heat-assisted extraction and deep eutectic solvents based on choline chloride and carboxylic acids. A preliminary solvent screening was performed using a selected group of carboxylic acids as hydrogen bond donors, showing that the highest extraction yield of phenolic compounds was obtained using choline chloride mixtures with butyric or phenylpropionic acid at a mole ratio 1:2, with 20% of water (w/w). The extraction conditions (time, temperature and water proportion) were then optimized by an experimental design, assisted by response surface methodology. To evaluate the response, the three most abundant compounds identified by HPLC (neochlorogenic acid, quercetin 3-O-glucoside and quercetin O-pentoside) were quantified. Additionally, the solid/liquid ratio effect at the optimal conditions, in dose-response format, was studied in view of its upscale, not showing any significant decrease until 140 g/L. The results here presented provide valuable information towards the design of a process in a pre-industrial form for the extraction of phenolic compounds from J. regia leaves using deep eutectic solvents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.029

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–147 of 147

Metadata

Authors
Vieira, V., Prieto, M. A., Barros, L., Coutinho, J. A. P., Ferreira, I. C. F. R., & Ferreira, O.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
  • Laboratório Associado CICECO – Instituto de Materiais de Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R.
  • Ferreira, Olga
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
115
Pages
261-271
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789362899
Cited by
147
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Investigo Institutional repository of UVigo (Universidade de Vigo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
phenolic compounds, Juglans regia, walnut leaves, deep eutectic solvents, choline chloride, carboxylic acids, heat-assisted extraction, solvent screening, extraction optimization, neochlorogenic acid, quercetin glycosides, solid-to-liquid ratio, green extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review