Cited by 39Digital Mental Health InterventionsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Experiences of undergoing Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for procrastination: A qualitative study

Open access
Rozental, Alexander, Forsström, David, Tangen, Josefine Almquist, Carlbring, Per·2015·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Internet interventions constitute a promising and cost-effective treatment alternative for a wide range of psychiatric disorders and somatic conditions. Several clinical trials have provided evidence for its efficacy and effectiveness, and recent research also indicate that it can be helpful in the treatment of conditions that are debilitating, but do not necessarily warrant more immediate care, for instance, procrastination, a self-regulatory failure that is associated with decreased well-being and mental health . However, providing treatment interventions for procrastination via the Internet is a novel approach, making it unclear how the participants themselves perceive their experiences. The current study thus investigated participants' own apprehension of undergoing Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for procrastination by distributing open-ended questions at the post-treatment assessment, for instance, “What did you think about the readability of the texts”, “How valuable do you believe that this treatment has been for you?”, and “The thing that I am most displeased with (and how it could be improved) is …”. In total, 75 participants (50%) responded, and the material was examined using thematic analysis. The results indicate that there exist both positive and negative aspects of the treatment program. Many participants increased their self-efficacy and were able to gain momentum on many tasks and assignments that had been deferred in their everyday life. Meanwhile…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2015.05.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such differences were previously observed in a transdiagnostic intervention, as all participants received the same program.

    “Such differences were previously observed in a transdiagnostic intervention, as all participants received the same program (Rozental et al., 2015).”

    From ICBT program for improving informal caregiver well-being: A qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as Rozental et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rozental, A., Forsström, D., Tangen, J. A., & Carlbring, P.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Rozental, Alexander
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
314-322
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W255858487
Cited by
39
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swedish Research Council (2011-38394-87877-7)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
procrastination, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, participant experiences, self-efficacy, medication adherence, motivation, readability, treatment modules, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review