Cited by 144Skin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentationNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 33 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Patterns of sunscreen use on the face and other exposed skin among US adults

Open access
Holman, Dawn M., Berkowitz, Zahava, Guy, Gery P., Hawkins, Nikki A., Saraiya, Mona, Watson, Meg·2015·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Sunscreen is a common form of sun protection, but little is known about patterns of use.Objective We sought to assess patterns of sunscreen use on the face and other exposed skin among US adults.Methods Using cross-sectional data from the 2013 Summer ConsumerStyles survey (N = 4033), we calculated descriptive statistics and adjusted risk ratios to identify characteristics associated with regular sunscreen use (always/most of the time when outside on a warm sunny day for ≥1 hour).Results Few adults regularly used sunscreen on the face (men: 18.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8-20.6; women: 42.6%, 95% CI 39.5-46.7), other exposed skin (men: 19.9%, 95% CI 17.5-22.6; women: 34.4%, 95% CI 31.5-37.5), or both the face and other exposed skin (men: 14.3%, 95% CI 12.3-16.6; women: 29.9%, 95% CI 27.2-32.8). Regular use was associated with sun-sensitive skin, an annual household income ≥$60,000, and meeting aerobic activity guidelines (Ps < .05). Nearly 40% of users were unsure if their sunscreen provided broad-spectrum protection.Limitations Reliance on self-report and lack of information on sunscreen reapplication or other sun-safety practices are limitations.Conclusion Sunscreen use is low, especially among certain demographic groups. These findings can inform sun-safety interventions and the interpretation of surveillance data on sunscreen use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1112

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

7 of 33 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 38 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported sunscreen use is an adequate measure of actual sunscreen use for the study's conclusions.

    “One, the study relies on self-reported information which is subject to error.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The broad spectrum protection question is understood by respondents such that 'not sure' responses reflect uncertainty about their sunscreen.

    “Does the sunscreen you usually use on your face provide broad spectrum (UVA and UVB) protection? [yes; no; not sure]”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Income association described in the opposite direction

    Minor

    The discussion calls the association between sunscreen use and household income inverse, but the results state that adults with lower incomes were less likely to use sunscreen regularly. That describes a positive association with income.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2001, Sunscreens. Chapter 3. Human Use of Sunscreen, Vol 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–134 of 134

Metadata

Authors
Holman, D. M., Berkowitz, Z., Guy, G. P., Hawkins, N. A., Saraiya, M., & Watson, M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Holman, Dawn M.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
83-92.e1
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1956821286
Cited by
144
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Keywords
sunscreen use, sun protection, face, sun sensitivity, socioeconomic factors, household income, physical activity, broad-spectrum protection, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Sunscreening Agents, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-31, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-31 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review