Cited by 99Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyTreatment of Major DepressionMicroRNA in disease regulation

A polymorphism in the microRNA-30e precursor associated with major depressive disorder risk and P300 waveform

Xu, Yong, Liu, Haiying, Li, Fei, Sun, Ning, Ren, Yan, Liu, Zhifen, Cao, Xiaohua, Wang, Yanfang +2 more·2010·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Growing evidence shows that the etiological causes and pathological processes underlying major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) overlap. Our previous study revealed a strong association between the polymorphism ss178077483 in the miRNA-30e precursor (pre-miR-30e) and the risk of SCZ. We thus hypothesized that this SCZ risk allele at the pre-miR-30e gene also confers risk of MDD. Methods To explore the relationship between miR-30e ss178077483 and MDD, we conducted an association analyses in 1088 MDD patients and 1102 control subjects from the Han Chinese population. We also determined the effects of miR-30e ss178077483 on the development of P300 event-related potential components induced by an auditory odd-ball task. Results We detected a statistically significant positive association between miR-30e ss178077483 and MDD (allelic P=0.0287; genotypic P=0.0275). Moreover, the P300 latency was associated with miR-30e ss178077483 genotypes and the individuals with the C/T genotype have a longer P300 latency than those carrying the C/C genotype (P=0.009). Limitations Larger numbers of subjects and different ethnic groups would confirm and strengthen these preliminary findings. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first evidence to suggest that miRNA polymorphisms may play an important role in MDD susceptibility. These findings also imply that certain miRNAs may be involved in the etiology of MDD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.019

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Liu, H., Li, F., Sun, N., Ren, Y., Liu, Z., Cao, X., Wang, Y., Liu, P., & Zhang, K.
Affiliations
  • Shanxi Medical University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Kerang
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
127
Issue
1-3
Pages
332-336
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040919803
Cited by
99
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
Keywords
major depressive disorder, miR-30e, microRNA polymorphisms, genetic susceptibility, P300 event-related potential, P300 latency, auditory oddball paradigm, schizophrenia, Han Chinese
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alleles, China, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, MicroRNAs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review