Cited by 133Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Efficacy of an outpatient treatment for prolonged grief disorder: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Rosner, Rita, Pfoh, Gabriele, Kotoučová, Michaela, Hagl, Maria·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Abnormal forms of grief, currently referred to as complicated grief or prolonged grief disorder, have been discussed extensively in recent years. While the diagnostic criteria are still debated, there is no doubt that prolonged grief is disabling and may require treatment. To date, few interventions have demonstrated efficacy. Methods We investigated whether outpatients suffering from prolonged grief disorder (PGD) benefit from a newly developed integrative cognitive behavioural therapy for prolonged grief (PG-CBT). A total of 51 patients were randomized into two groups, stratified by the type of death and their relationship to the deceased; 24 patients composed the treatment group and 27 patients composed the wait list control group (WG). Treatment consisted of 20-25 sessions. Main outcome was change in grief severity; secondary outcomes were reductions in general psychological distress and in comorbidity. Results Patients on average had 2.5 comorbid diagnoses in addition to PGD. Between group effect sizes were large for the improvement of grief symptoms in treatment completers (Cohen׳s d=1.61) and in the intent-to-treat analysis (d=1.32). Comorbid depressive symptoms also improved in PG-CBT compared to WG. The completion rate was 79% in PG-CBT and 89% in WG. Limitations The major limitations of this study were a small sample size and that PG-CBT took longer than the waiting time. Conclusions PG-CBT was found to be effective with an acceptable dropout rate. Given the number of bereaved people who suffer from PGD, the results are of high clinical relevance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.035

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy is highly efficacious in reducing the severity of grief.

    “cognitive-behavioral therapy is highly efficacious in reducing the severity of grief”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Rosner et al., 2014

  • A CBT treatment for prolonged mourning was found to be highly effective in reducing the severity of grief, with a controlled effect size d = 1.61.

    “This treatment was found to be highly effective in terms of reducing the severity of grief.The controlled effect size for the improvement of grief symptoms in people who completed CBT treatment was d = 1.61 (Rosner, Pfoh, Kotoučová, & Hagl, 2014).”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Rosner et al., 2014

  • CBT applied to Prolonged Grief is highly effective in reducing the severity of grief in individuals who complete treatment.

    “The review identified various techniques used for the management of PGD, with CBT applied to Prolonged Grief being found to be highly effective in terms of reducing the severity of grief in individuals who complete treatment (Rosner et al., 2014).”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Rosner et al., 2014

  • CBT for PGT is highly effective in reducing grief severity.

    “-Highly effective in terms of reducing grief severity (Rosner et al., 2014).”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Rosner et al., 2014

  • The effect size for symptom improvement with CBT for PGT is d = 1.61.

    “-Effect size for symptom improvement: d = 1.61 (Rosner et al., 2014).”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Rosner et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosner, R., Pfoh, G., Kotoučová, M., & Hagl, M.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Rosner, Rita
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
167
Pages
56-63
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115507862
Cited by
133
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, complicated grief, outpatient psychotherapy, grief severity, depressive symptoms, comorbidities, bereavement, treatment discontinuation, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Depression, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review