Cited by 46Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection

Open access
Caouette, Justin D., Guyer, Amanda E.·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The emotional context insensitivity (ECI) hypothesis suggests individuals with depression have blunted affective responses to both positive and negative events. We tested ECI in a social context to examine how depression relates to affective responses to social acceptance and rejection outcomes. Furthermore, we aimed to identify cognitive mechanisms linking depression with affective response to social feedback. Finally, we tested whether these processes are similar for social anxiety.Method 90 participants (age 18-26 years; 53 women) completed the two-visit Chatroom task. At Visit 1 they rated their expectations about being liked by 60 peers. At Visit 2 they completed self-reports of depressive and social anxiety symptoms, and of cognitive flexibility, then received acceptance or rejection feedback from each peer and rated their affective response.Results Greater depressive symptoms related to negative expectancy bias, lower cognitive flexibility, and less positive affective response to acceptance, but did not relate to rejection. Negative expectations and cognitive flexibility mediated the relationship between depressive symptoms and affective response for acceptance; only negative expectations mediated rejection responses. These cognitive mechanisms were not related to social anxiety.Limitations A community sample was used to assess depression. Rumination and current mood state were omitted as potential predictors of affective response.Conclusions Findings support the ECI framework. Depression but not social anxiety interferes with positive and negative affect through cognitively mediated dampening of emotional response to social acceptance and rejection. Emotion regulation strategies in depression therapy can target social flexibility to improve alignment of affective reactions to social outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.015

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with SAD experience diminished positive affect and increased negative affect in social interactions in general.

    “For example, people with SAD experience diminished positive affect and increased negative affect in social interactions in general (32), and reduced positivity in response to social acceptance and enhanced negativity in response to social rejection (33).”

    From MDMA-Assisted Therapy as a Means to Alter Affective, Cognitive, Behavioral, and Neurological Systems Underlying Social Dysfunction in Social Anxiety Disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    In Results > Secondary Analyses: Social Anxiety Symptoms as a Predictor (page unavailable), greater social anxiety symptoms predicted a less positive response to acceptance, supporting one part of the claim. The study examined responses to specific social feedback, not social interactions in general or people diagnosed with SAD; it also found a less negative response to rejection, rather than increased negative affect. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Monroe SM Slavich GM Georgiades K Gotlib IH Hammen CL The social environment and life stress in depression Handbook of depression 2009 2nd New York, NY Guilford Press 340 360

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caouette, J. D., & Guyer, A. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Caouette, Justin D.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
190
Pages
792-799
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2185769514
Cited by
46
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006), R00MH080076)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
depression, cognitive distortions, social acceptance, social rejection, emotional responses, cognitive flexibility, social anxiety, emotion regulation, peer feedback
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Psychological Distance, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review