Cited by 255Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Physical activity and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Vancampfort, Davy, Hallgren, Mats, Firth, Joseph, Rosenbaum, Simon, Schuch, Felipe B., Mugisha, James, Probst, Michel, Van Damme, Tine +2 more·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background A potential approach to suicide prevention that has not been closely examined, but which holds promise in terms of widespread dissemination without major side-effects, is physical activity (PA). This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to: (a) explore associations between PA and suicidal ideation (SI) levels, and (b) investigate the effect of PA interventions on SI.Methods Major electronic databases were searched from inception up to 05/2017 to identify quantitative studies reporting an association between PA and SI. A quantitative correlates synthesis and random effects meta-analysis were conducted.Results Fourteen of 21 studies in adults (67%) (n = 130,737), 7/14 (50%) in adolescents (n = 539,170) and 2/3 (67%) in older adults (n = 50,745) found a significant negative association between PA- and SI-levels. Pooled adjusted meta-analysis of 14 effect sizes over eight studies and 80,856 people found that those who were "active" versus those who were "inactive" were less likely to have SI (OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.76-0.98). Additionally, meeting PA guidelines conferred a significant protective effect against SI (OR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.51-0.99, P = 0.03; N studies = 3, n people = 122,395), while not meeting guidelines was associated with increased SI (OR = 1.16, 95%CI = 1.09-1.24, P < 0.001; N = 4, n = 78,860). Data from the intervention studies (N = 3, n = 121) was mixed and limited.Limitations Our findings are based mainly on cross-sectional studies, while the majority of studies did not include a rigorous physical activity assessment.Conclusions The current study suggests that higher PA levels are associated with lower SI. However, the associations observed need to be confirmed in prospective observational studies and controlled trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.070

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who reported meeting current physical activity guidelines were significantly less likely to report suicidal ideation, while individuals who did not meet current physical activity guidelines were significantly more likely to report suicidal ideation.

    “Further, individuals who reported meeting current physical activity guidelines were significantly less likely to report suicidal ideation, while individuals who did not meet current physical activity guidelines were significantly more likely to report suicidal ideation [148].”
  • There is a significant negative association between physical activity and suicidal ideation.

    “While the results are based on cross-sectional data, there was a significant negative association between physical activity and suicidal ideation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vancampfort, D., Hallgren, M., Firth, J., Rosenbaum, S., Schuch, F. B., Mugisha, J., Probst, M., Van Damme, T., Carvalho, A. F., & Stubbs, B.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
  • Butabika Hospital (UG)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Vancampfort, Davy
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
225
Pages
438-448
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748449302
Cited by
255
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ICA-CL-2017-03-001, NIHR-INF-0685)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
physical activity, suicidal ideation, suicide prevention, physical activity interventions, physical activity guidelines, physical inactivity, adolescents, older adults, adults
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Attitude to Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Prospective Studies, Suicide, Health Behavior, Exercise, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review