Cited by 117Nutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older AdultsBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Geriatric Hospitalized Patients

Smoliner, Christine, Sieber, Cornel C., Wirth, Rainer·2014·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives Sarcopenia, a common syndrome in older individuals, is characterized by a progressive loss of muscle mass and muscle strength. Although data exist on the prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older individuals and nursing home residents, there has been no systematic research in hospitalized older patients according to newly developed criteria.Design Cross-sectional study design.Setting Acute geriatric ward of a general hospital.Participants Geriatric inpatients.Measurements Hand grip strength was measured with the Jamar dynamometer, skeletal muscle index was calculated from raw data obtained from the bioelectrical impedance analysis, and physical function was assessed with the Short Physical Performance Battery. Sarcopenia was defined according to the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP).Results This study involved 198 patients from a geriatric acute ward. Mean age was 82.8 ± 5.9 years and 70.2% (n = 139) of the study participants were women. Thirteen patients (6.6%) were defined as sarcopenic and 37 (18.7%) were defined as severely sarcopenic. In a group comparison, patients with sarcopenia had a poorer nutritional status. In a binary logistic regression analysis, only body mass index was associated with sarcopenia, whereas gender, age, length of stay, cognitive function, and self-care capacity were not.Conclusion The prevalence of sarcopenia in geriatric hospitalized patients is high and does not differ from those of other older individuals. Nutritional status is associated with sarcopenia. The predictive value of sarcopenia regarding outcome for older individuals still requires evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.027

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smoliner, C., Sieber, C. C., & Wirth, R.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Wirth, Rainer
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
267-272
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012074350
Cited by
117
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
sarcopenia, prevalence, hospitalized older adults, grip strength, skeletal muscle index, bioelectrical impedance analysis, Short Physical Performance Battery, nutritional status, body mass index, EWGSOP criteria, muscle mass and strength
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Geriatric Assessment, Prevalence, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review