Cited by 228Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The Association between Social Media Use and Eating Concerns among US Young Adults

Open access
Sidani, Jaime E., Shensa, Ariel, Hoffman, Beth, Hanmer, Janel, Primack, Brian A.·2016·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background The etiology of eating concerns is multifactorial, and exposure to media messages is considered to be a contributor. Although traditional media, such as television and magazines, have been examined extensively in relation to eating concerns risk, the influence of social media has received relatively less attention.Objective To examine the association between social media use and eating concerns in a large, nationally representative sample of young adults.Design Cross-sectional survey.Participants/setting Participants were 1,765 young adults aged 19 to 32 years who were randomly selected from a national probability-based online nonvolunteer panel.Outcome measures An eating concerns scale was adapted from two validated measures: the SCOFF Questionnaire and the Eating Disorder Screen for Primary Care. Social media use (including Facebook, Twitter, Google+, YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, Vine, Snapchat, and Reddit) was assessed using both volume (time per day) and frequency (visits per week).Statistical analyses To examine associations between eating concerns and social media use, ordered logistic regression was used, controlling for all covariates.Results Compared with those in the lowest quartile, participants in the highest quartiles for social media volume and frequency had significantly greater odds of having eating concerns (adjusted odds ratio 2.18, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.17 and adjusted odds ratio 2.55, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.78, respectively). There were significant positive overall linear associations between the social media use variables and eating concerns (P<0.001).Conclusions The results from this study indicate a strong and consistent association between social media use and eating concerns in a nationally representative sample of young adults aged 19 to 32 years. This association was apparent whether social media use was measured as volume or frequency. Further research should assess the temporality of these associations. It would also be useful to examine more closely the influence of specific characteristics of social media use, including content-related and contextual features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2016.03.021

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research evidence highlights an association between highly-visual social media use and disordered eating among adolescents.

    “The findings also align with previous research evidence highlighting the association between highly-visual social media use and disordered eating among adolescents (Rodgers et al., 2020;Sidani et al., 2016).”

    From Relation Between Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns and Disordered Eating in Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Sidani et al., 2016

    The Multivariable Analyses report an association between greater overall social media use and eating concerns. The Discussion describes visually oriented platforms as a possible source of relevant images, but the study did not isolate highly visual use; its sample was ages 19–32, and the Discussion says the results cannot be generalized to other age groups. It therefore does not establish the claimed association among adolescents. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010; 375(9714):583-93. [PubMed: 19931176]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sidani, J. E., Shensa, A., Hoffman, B., Hanmer, J., & Primack, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Sidani, Jaime E.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
116
Issue
9
Pages
1465-1472
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346486083
Cited by
228
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA140150)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media use, eating concerns, young adults, eating disorders, media exposure, SCOFF questionnaire, eating disorder risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review