Cited by 179Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social phobia and positive social events: The price of success

Wallace, Scott T., Alden, Lynn E.·1997·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.106.3.416

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wallace, S. T., & Alden, L. E.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1997-08
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
416-424
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W4313371717
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, social success, social anxiety, social evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review