Cited by 121Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The temporal precedence of metacognition in the development of anxiety and depression symptoms in the context of life-stress: A prospective study

Open access
Yılmaz, A. Esin, Gençöz, Tülin, Wells, Adrian·2011·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

According to the metacognitive theory of psychological disorder, metacognitions are vulnerability factors in predicting development of psychological symptoms. The present study investigated metacognitive factors and life stress in a prospective test of their proposed temporal precedence in the development of anxiety and depression symptoms. Participants were 172 students and adults recruited in Ankara and Bolu, Turkey. Two separate sets of hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. In these analyses, Time 2 anxiety or depression was regressed on the main and interaction effects of metacognition and stress after controlling for baseline symptom levels measured at Time 1, age, and gender. Results revealed that negative metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of worry significantly predicted residual change in both anxiety and depression after controlling for the negative effect of stressful life events. Furthermore, lack of cognitive confidence interacted with daily hassles to predict the change in anxiety, when the baseline level of anxiety and other individual differences were controlled. Our results support the metacognitive theory of psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.001

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yılmaz, A. E., Gençöz, T., & Wells, A.
Affiliations
  • Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
  • Middle East Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Yılmaz, A. Esin
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
389-396
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989288253
Cited by
121
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
metacognition, metacognitive beliefs, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, life events, daily hassles, cognitive confidence, temporal precedence, vulnerability factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review