Cited by 177Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

“I just don’t focus on my needs.” The unmet health needs of partner and offspring caregivers of people with dementia: A qualitative study

Tatangelo, Gemma, McCabe, Marita, Macleod, Ashley, You, Emily·2018·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Family caregivers of people with dementia have significant unmet health needs. There is a lack of research that differentiates between the needs that are specifically relevant to partner and offspring caregivers. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the health needs of partner and offspring caregivers of older people with dementia, including the barriers they experience in meeting their needs. Method Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 family caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia. Of these, 12 were partner caregivers (4 men, 8 women) and 12 were offspring caregivers (2 men, 10 women). The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified within the data. The first theme represents caregivers' overall assessment and perception of their health needs. The remaining four themes represent the most important aspects of caregivers' health needs; mental health, emotional support and social relationships, healthy diet and exercise, and personal time. While these themes were similar for offspring and partner caregivers, the specific needs and barriers within these areas were different. A prominent barrier for partner caregivers was that they had difficulty in acknowledging their needs. Despite this, partner caregivers demonstrated unmet emotional support needs, as they no longer had emotional support from their partner with dementia. They also had an unmet need for time away from the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.011

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tatangelo, G., McCabe, M., Macleod, A., & You, E.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Tatangelo, Gemma
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
77
Pages
8-14
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754770958
Cited by
177
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, unmet health needs, partner caregivers, caregiver mental health, emotional support, social isolation, interpersonal relationships, personal time, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Diet, Emotions, Family, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Social Support, Exercise, Caregivers, Spouses, Adult Children, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review