The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
Open accessAbstract
This article is the second of two parts intended to serve as a primer for structural equations models for the behavioral researcher. The first article introduced the basics: the measurement model, the structural model, and the combined, full structural equations model. In this second article, advanced issues are addressed, including fit indices and sample size, moderators, longitudinal data, mediation, and so forth.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results in Figure 1 suggested excellent model fit (Iacobucci 2010: p. 91): χ 2 (32) = 97.994(p=0.000); and χ 2 /df = 3.06.Further, GFI = .968;CFI = .984;RMSEA = .061;and SRMR = .0278;thus corroborating the excellent model fit to the data”
From Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation (2014) · cites this paper as Iacobucci 2010
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 · Cited by 6,691
Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1 · Cited by 1,231
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0070 · Cited by 1,228
On the Meaning of within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208993 · Cited by 526 · cited 2×
“The latter is run by specifying the “same pattern” of links—the links are the same in both groups but the parameter estimate values might vary—a weaker form of cross-validation. correlations between errors, e.g., in θε or θδ, which are normally assumed to be independent (Gerbing & Anderson 1984).”
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1007/BF02294170 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.229 · DOI
- 10.2307/3151716 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- Bollen K.A., 1990, Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256 · DOI
- Browne M.W., 2002, When fit indices and residuals are incompatible, Psychological Methods, 7, 403, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.403 · DOI
- 10.1080/10705519509540000 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-4076(83)90094-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220973.1987.10806438 · DOI
- Fan X., 2005, Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components, Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343, 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1 · DOI
- 10.1080/10705519709540063 · DOI
- 10.2307/3151718 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/0049124192021002002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2003_2 · DOI
- 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.205 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781412984966 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_2 · DOI
- Kline R.B., 2004, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2nd ed
- 10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1 · DOI
- 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.19 · DOI
- Marcoulides G.A., 1996, Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques
- 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr3102_5 · DOI
- Muthén B.O., 1984, A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators, Psychometrika, 49, 115, 10.1007/BF02294210 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_3 · DOI
- 10.1080/10705519609540052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_6 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
Huang, Y.-T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2014) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.005 · Cited by 125
“Iacobucci (2010) states that a sample of approximately 1000, achieves sufficient accuracy to extend and generalise the findings beyond the context studied.”
BackgroundGoldman, S., van Herk, H., Verhagen, T., & Weltevreden, J. (2020) · International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/0266242620962658 · Cited by 194
“The fit indexes obtained for the multi-group analysis indicate that the model has a good fit for both markets: Chi-square /df = 1.78, CFI = 0.94, NNFI = 0.92, SRMR = 0.07, RMSEA = 0.06 (Iacobucci, 2010).”
InfluentialDoes concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest?
Elliott, W. B., Rennekamp, K. M., & White, B. J. (2014) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-014-9315-6 · Cited by 172
“Fit statistics indicate that the model is a good fit for the data: v2ð1 df Þ = 0.112 (p = 0.738), RMSEA\ 0.001, and CFI = 1.000 (Iacobucci 2009, 2010; Kline 2011). geographically distant (Houston-based) firm in our materials did not feel psychologically close for our participants.”
InfluentialElliott, W. B., Grant, S. M., & Rennekamp, K. M. (2017) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12302 · Cited by 155
Toward an integrated model of tourist expectation formation and gender difference
Wang, C., Qu, H., & Hsu, M. K. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.009 · Cited by 143
Measuring the Impact of Online Reviews on Consumer Purchase Decisions – a Scale Development Study
Fernandes, S., Panda, R., Vg, V., Swar, B., & Shi, P. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4045914 · Cited by 121
Formative Constructs Implemented via Common Factors
Treiblmaier, H., Bentler, P. M., & Mair, P. (2011) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.532693 · Cited by 104
“The aim of this paper is to clarify this difficulty and to propose a new methodology to approximate a non-factor LV by an identified common factor that can be used in any structural equation model (SEM) in the standard way (Bentler, 2010; Iacobucci, 2009, 2010; Savalei & Bentler, 2006).”
MethodExtrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and New Product Development Performance
Malek, S. L., Sarin, S., & Haon, C. (2020) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12554 · Cited by 164
Su, C.-T., Ng, H.-S., Yang, A.-L., & Lin, C. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0036764 · Cited by 126
“Although one recent review (Iacobucci, 2010) on sample size suggests that 50 is sufficient, we believe that research using a larger sample (say, n 200) will provide more robust results.”
Malesios, C., Dey, P. K., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-3080-z · Cited by 140
“Also, cut-off threshold values for the goodness-of-fit criteria heavily depends on sample size and model complexity (see also Iacobucci 2010, for another discussion on the subject).”
BackgroundChong, V. K., & Monroe, G. (2015) · Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1111/acfi.12049 · Cited by 118
Asmelash, A. G., & Kumar, S. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01335 · Cited by 117
“As stated in the literature, a sample size of 200 and higher is quite enough to run a multivariate analysis (Byrne, 2010; Iacobucci, 2010; Kline, 2011).”
BackgroundKautish, P., & Sharma, R. (2018) · Journal of Indian Business Research · doi:10.1108/jibr-01-2018-0013 · Cited by 157
A latent profile analysis of adult students’ online self-regulation in blended learning environments
Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Pynoo, B., Lombaerts, K., Tondeur, J., & Scherer, R. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.021 · Cited by 146
Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners' motivation in distance Education
Tuğtekin, E. B., & Dursun, Ö. Ö. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5 · Cited by 156
What is the public appetite for healthy eating policies? Evidence from a cross-European survey
Mazzocchi, M., Cagnone, S., Bech‐Larsen, T., Niedźwiedzka, B., Saba, A., Shankar, B., Verbeke, W., & Traill, B. W. (2014) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133114000346 · Cited by 128
“The final model, which only retains those explanatory factors and covariates significant at the 10% confidence level in at least one of the structural equations, shows an excellent goodness-of-fit by SEM standards (Iacobucci, 2010).”
BackgroundIwamoto, D. K., Corbin, W. R., Lejuez, C. W., & MacPherson, L. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0031594 · Cited by 113
Cai, L., Yuen, K. F., Xie, D., Fang, M., & Wang, X. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101789 · Cited by 142
Liu, B. F., Wood, M. M., Egnoto, M. J., Bean, H., Sutton, J. N., Mileti, D. S., & Madden, S. (2017) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.004 · Cited by 112
Zheng, C. S.-M., Kashi, K., Fan, D., Molineux, J., & Ee, M. S. (2015) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1020447 · Cited by 118
Chan, K. Y., Ho, M.-H. R., Chernyshenko, O. S., Bedford, O., Uy, M. A., Gomulya, D., Sam, Y. L., & Phan, W. M. J. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.05.001 · Cited by 110
Bellini, E., Piroli, G., & Pennacchio, L. (2018) · Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9655-7 · Cited by 110
Pradabwong, J., Braziotis, C., Tannock, J. D. T., & Pawar, K. S. (2017) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-01-2017-0008 · Cited by 160
Explore public acceptance of autonomous buses: An integrated model of UTAUT, TTF and trust
Cai, L., Yuen, K. F., & Wang, X. (2022) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.010 · Cited by 133
Kuntsche, E. N., Rossow, I. M., Simons‐Morton, B. G., ter Bogt, T., Kokkevi, A., & Godeau, E. (2012) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01895.x · Cited by 107
“…the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI, both preferably .95 147 8 or higher) and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) and the root mean square 148 error of approximation (RMSEA, both preferably .08 or lower) served as model fit indices 149 (Chen et al., 2008; Iacobucci, 2010; Marsh et al., 2004).”
MethodLiang, Q., Zhou, Z., Ye, G., & Shen, L.-Y. (2022) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105486 · Cited by 108
Group behavior in social media: Antecedents of initial trust formation
Shareef, M. A., Kapoor, K. K., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106225 · Cited by 123
“…fit index (CFI), goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), normed fit index (NFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and relative fit index (RFI) were compared with recommended values (Iacobucci, 2010; Kline, 2011), and found acceptable (Table 3).”
MethodLeader reactions to follower proactive behavior: Giving credit when credit is due
Fuller, B., Marler, L. E., Hester, K., & Otondo, R. F. (2015) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726714548235 · Cited by 101
“Consistent with reviews of fit indices for structural equations modeling (e.g. Iacobucci, 2010), we report χ2/degrees of freedom, the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) and the comparative fit index (CFI).”
MethodEstiri, H. (2014) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.013 · Cited by 106
Explaining performance determinants: A knowledge based view of international new ventures
Martin, S. L., & Javalgi, R. G. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.041 · Cited by 119
Ma, Y. (2021) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101707 · Cited by 119
Sorkun, M. F. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.026 · Cited by 109
Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia
Chou, J., & Yutami, I. G. A. N. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.083 · Cited by 105
Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask
Fabrigar, L. R., Porter, R. D., & Norris, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.003 · Cited by 95
Parast, M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107671 · Cited by 126
“Assessment of the model fit using AMOS 24.0 provided an acceptable model fit: χ2/df ¼ 1.9, RMSEA ¼ (0.073, 0.087) (Hu and Bentler, 1999; Iacobucci, 2010).”
MethodInfluentialMarques, L. M., Valentine, S. E., Kaysen, D. L., Mackintosh, M., Silva, L. E. D. D., Ahles, E. M., Youn, S. J., Shtasel, D. L., Simon, N. M., & Stirman, S. W. (2019) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000384 · Cited by 114
“While this can indicate model misspecification, SRMR is strongly affected by small sample sizes (Iacobucci, 2010).”
Crawford, J., & Kelder, J. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.001 · Cited by 138
Developing and validating a technology upgrade model
Wang, Y.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., & Lin, T. (2017) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.003 · Cited by 112
“Although previous research has noted that two are acceptable (Iacobucci, 2010), ideally each construct should be measured by at least three items.”
BackgroundZhao, J., Song, F., Ren, S., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Liu, W., Wan, Y., Xu, H., Zhou, T., Hu, T., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049542 · Cited by 97
Determining Success Factors for a Construction Organization: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Tripathi, K. K., & Jha, K. (2018) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000569 · Cited by 101
Hauser, M., Nussbeck, F. W., & Jonas, K. (2013) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20644 · Cited by 100
A new scale for the measurement of quality of life in children with intellectual disability.
Gómez, L., Alcedo, M. Á., Arias, B., Fontanil, Y., Arias, V., Monsalve, A., & Verdugo, M. (2016) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.03.005 · Cited by 100
Discrimination and well-being amongst the homeless: the role of multiple group membership
Johnstone, M., Jetten, J., Dingle, G., Parsell, C., & Walter, Z. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00739 · Cited by 100
“To determine the fit of the model, we included several absolute and relative fit indices (see Hu and Bentler, 1999; Iacobucci, 2010), including the χ2 goodness-of-fit test, the comparative fit index (CFI), the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), and Akaike’s Information Criterion…”
MethodIannello, P., Sorgente, A., Lanz, M., & Antonietti, A. (2020) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00277-x · Cited by 115
Construct Validity in Survey-Based Management Accounting and Control Research
Bedford, D. S., & Speklé, R. F. (2018) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-51995 · Cited by 148
The Role of Self-Identity in Predicting Fruit and Vegetable Intake
Carfora, V., Caso, D., & Conner, M. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.020 · Cited by 96
“…SEM models was estimated by 268 using Chi-Square and recommended incremental goodness-of-fit indexes: the root mean square 269 error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 270 and the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR; Iacobucci, 2010).”
InfluentialWang, X., Qin, X., & Zhou, Y. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1704297 · Cited by 116
“This sample size can be regarded as adequate as it meets a minimum sample size of 50 (Iacobucci, 2010) or the criteria proposed by Tinsley and Tinsley (1987), suggesting a ratio of about 5 to 10 subjects for each indicator.”
BackgroundHuijts, N., & van Wee, B. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.131 · Cited by 96
Store environment's impact on variety seeking behavior
Mohan, G., Sivakumaran, B., & Sharma, P. (2012) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.04.003 · Cited by 96
Crutzen, R., Cyr, D., & de Vries, N. K. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1922 · Cited by 91
“09 [44,45].”
Ault, J. K. (2016) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2016.18 · Cited by 95
“However, these measures are sensitive to sample size and are therefore not recommended for samples less than 250 (Iacobucci, 2010).”
BackgroundAlonso, M. Á. V., Gómez, L. E., Martínez, B. A., Navas, P., & Schalock, R. L. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.025 · Cited by 116
“Regarding Chi-square analysis, it is recommended to examine its magnitude rather than its level of significance (e.g., Barrett, 2007; Flora & Curran, 2004; Iacobucci, 2010; Kline, 2010).”
BackgroundEtminani-Ghasrodashti, R., & Ardeshiri, M. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.016 · Cited by 93
“In another definition, lifestyle is behavioral patterns which derived from underlying opinions and orientations, including beliefs, interests and attitudes (Kitamura, 2009).”
BackgroundStyvén, M. E., Näppä, A., Mariani, M. M., & Nataraajan, R. (2022) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.038 · Cited by 92
“The fit indices of the final CFA were acceptable ( Х 2 /df = 2.35, CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08) (Iacobucci, 2010) and the average variance extracted was well above 0.50 for all constructs.”
MethodInfluentialBuldur, B., & Güvendi, Ö. N. (2019) · International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry · doi:10.1111/ipd.12583 · Cited by 91
Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: an updated meta-analysis
Soares, M. D. C., & Perin, M. G. (2019) · RAUSP Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rausp-01-2019-0014 · Cited by 233
Parast, M., & Subramanian, N. (2021) · Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1108/scm-07-2020-0313 · Cited by 90
Using Facebook for travel decision-making: an international study of antecedents
Mariani, M. M., Styvén, M. E., & Ayeh, J. K. (2019) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-02-2018-0158 · Cited by 110
Latif, K. F. (2017) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1794-y · Cited by 134
Reciprocal Behavioral Plasticity and Behavioral Types during Predator-Prey Interactions
McGhee, K. E., Pintor, L., & Bell, A. (2013) · American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/673526 · Cited by 90
“Our original a priori predator-prey model that included feedback fit our data adequately and was not rejected (original model with feedback: , , ,2x p 5.57 df p 8 P p .695 Akaike Information Criterion , ;[AIC] p 61.57 CFI p 1.0 Iacobucci 2010).”
MethodInfluentialSEM with simplicity and accuracy
Bentler, P. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.002 · Cited by 90
Wu, M., Wang, N., & Yuen, K. F. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122384 · Cited by 92
Khan, B. A., & Naeem, H. (2016) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2016.1263543 · Cited by 91
“As far as sample size is concerned, Iacobucci (2010) suggested that for the SEM analy-”
BackgroundXie, X.-Z., & Tsai, N.-C. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101503 · Cited by 104
Best Practice Recommendations for Using Structural Equation Modelling in Psychological Research
Morrison, T. G., Morrison, M. A., & McCutcheon, J. (2017) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2017.89086 · Cited by 98
APROXIMACIÓN CONCEPTUAL Y PRÁCTICA A LOS MODELOS DE ECUACIONES ESTRUCTURALES
Medrano, L. A., & Muñoz‐Navarro, R. (2017) · Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.19083/ridu.11.486 · Cited by 211
“Como regla general se recomienda utilizar ML (Iacobucci, 2010).”
BackgroundYan, M., Kwok, A. P. K., Chan, A. H. S., Zhuang, Y. S., Wen, K., & Zhang, K. C. (2022) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2020-0625 · Cited by 138
Ethical food choices: Examining people’s Fair Trade purchasing decisions
O’Connor, E. L., Sims, L., & White, K. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.04.001 · Cited by 87
“However, given that even trivial deviations from a perfect model are likely to produce a significant χ2 statistic with large sample sizes (Iacobucci, 2010), the “normed” χ2 statistic (χ2/df) was also examined.”
BackgroundLee, C. S., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J. C., DiStefano, R., & O’Connor, D. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452 · Cited by 117
“However, because χ2 is sensitive to sample size and model complexity (Iacobucci, 2010; Kline, 2011), the absolute, relative, and comparative GOF indices were used to determine model fit.”
MethodTeam participation and online gamer loyalty
Teng, C., & Chen, W. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.08.001 · Cited by 80
“The IFI and CFI indices exceeded .95, fulfilling the criteria provided by Bagozzi and Yi (1988) and Iacobucci (2010).”
MethodCustomer experience and brand loyalty in the full-service hotel sector: the role of brand affect
Guan, J., Wang, W., Guo, Z., Chan, J. H., & Qi, X. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-10-2020-1177 · Cited by 126
Shukla, S. (2019) · Journal of Asia-Pacific Business · doi:10.1080/10599231.2019.1684171 · Cited by 100
“A maximum likelihood algorithm (Iacobucci, 2010) was employed to examine both the measurement and structural model as has been confirmed as a substantial method (Mohd Suki, 2016) of evaluating parameter complications.”
MethodYang, M., Dijst, M., Faber, J., & Helbich, M. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109121 · Cited by 104
“Following the suggestions of others (Iacobucci, 2010), the model goodness-of-fit was assessed by the following multiple indicators: goodness of fit index (GFI> 0.95), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI> 0.90), comparative fit index (CFI> 0.95), root mean square error of approximation…”
MethodInfluentialCustomer loyalty in the fast food restaurants of Bangladesh
Uddin, M. B. (2019) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2019-0140 · Cited by 85
Antecedents and consequences of passenger satisfaction with the airport
Bezerra, G. C. L., & Gomes, C. F. (2020) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101766 · Cited by 99
“For model estimation, the covariance matrix and the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method were used (Byrne, 2010; Hair et al., 2018; Iacobucci, 2010; Kline, 2011).”
MethodProcedural and Distributive Fairness: Determinants of Overall Price Fairness
Ferguson, J. L., Ellen, P. S., & Bearden, W. O. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1694-2 · Cited by 102
Buldur, B. (2020) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/cdoe.12530 · Cited by 83
Elliott, W. B., Fanning, K., & Peecher, M. E. (2019) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-52508 · Cited by 107
Lee, P. J., Lee, B. K., Jeon, J. Y., Zhang, M., & Kang, J. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1066877 · Cited by 91
“It was assumed that the sample sizes for China and Korea were adequate, because previous studies had reported that a sample size of 100 is usually sufficient for convergence (Anderson and Gerbing 1984; Iacobucci 2010).”
BackgroundSun, Y., Zhong, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., & Zhu, M. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114189 · Cited by 83
Davvetas, V., Diamantopoulos, A., Zaefarian, G., & Sichtmann, C. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.016 · Cited by 82
Decius, J., Schaper, N., & Seifert, A. (2021) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-021-09265-5 · Cited by 122
“…present study, we additionally considered two alternative, separate submodels as a robustness check, following methodological recommendations (e.g., Iacobucci 2010; Weston and Gore 2006): on the one hand only with the antecedents and IWL, on the other hand only with IWL and the learning outcomes.”
BackgroundMethodBarbeau, K., Boileau, K., Sarr, F., & Smith, K. (2019) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.15.1.p038 · Cited by 102
“Type of data: Endogenous variables must be continuous or categorical data, which includes scale, interval, ordinal, or nominal data (Iacobucci, 2010).”
BackgroundWang, Y., Li-fu, J., & Mao, H. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09909-x · Cited by 87
Supply chain risk mitigation competency: an individual-level knowledge-based perspective
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J. V., & Cantor, D. E. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1070972 · Cited by 95
“The CFA analysis revealed an overall excellent fit for the measurement model: χ2 = 257.77 (df = 146, χ2/df = 1.77, p < 0.001), CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, and RMSEA = 0.062 (0.049, 0.074) (Hu and Bentler 1999; Iacobucci 2010) indicating acceptable psychometric properties for all constructs.”
MethodInfluentialHayden, K. M., Jones, R. N., Zimmer, C., Plassman, B. L., Browndyke, J. N., Pieper, C. F., Warren, L. H., & Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. (2010) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/wad.0b013e3181ffa76d · Cited by 80
Kyndt, E., Coertjens, L., van Daal, T., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & van Petegem, P. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.001 · Cited by 77
Aboalganam, K. M., AlFraihat, S.-F.-A., & Tarabieh, S. (2025) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci15040117 · Cited by 76
Kayser, L., Rossen, S., Karnoe, A., Elsworth, G. R., Vibe-Petersen, J., Christensen, J. F., Ried‐Larsen, M., & Osborne, R. H. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10377 · Cited by 85
“For example, Iacobucci [19], in reviewing the effect of sample size on convergence, numerical quality, and the typical fit indices used in CFA (and which are also available for EFA and exploratory structural equation modeling [ESEM] in Mplus), concluded that “It is of some comfort that SEM models…”
Do ongoing relationships buffer the effects of service recovery on customers' trust and loyalty?
dos Santos, C. P., & Basso, K. (2012) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321211222540 · Cited by 78
Amponsah, A. A., Adekoya, A. F., & Weyori, B. A. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100081 · Cited by 91
Investigating the causes of delay in grain bin construction projects: the case of China
Chen, G.-X., Shan, M., Chan, A., Liu, X., & Zhao, Y.-Q. (2019) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2017.1354514 · Cited by 74
“Also, according to Iacobucci (2010), SEM can still perform well even with small sample sizes (e.g. 50–100).”
BackgroundYang, C.-C., & Hsu, W.-L. (2017) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.005 · Cited by 74
Drinking motives and drinking behavior over time: A full cross-lagged panel study among adults.
Crutzen, R., Kuntsche, E. N., & Schelleman‐Offermans, K. (2012) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0029824 · Cited by 70
A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Fatigue-related Risk Factors for Occupational Injury
Arlinghaus, A., Lombardi, D. A., Willetts, J. L., Folkard, S., & Christiani, D. C. (2012) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kws219 · Cited by 75
“While the χ(2) test is likely to yield a model rejection in large samples, these model fit indicators provide information independent of the sample size (49, 50).”
BackgroundChildren’s fine motor skills in kindergarten predict reading in grade 1
Suggate, S. P., Pufke, E., & Stoeger, H. (2019) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.015 · Cited by 105
Examining the relationship between place attachment and behavioral loyalty in an urban park setting
Plunkett, D., Fulthorp, K., & Paris, C. M. (2019) · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism · doi:10.1016/j.jort.2018.11.006 · Cited by 73
Peer-to-peer selling in online platforms: A salient business model for virtual entrepreneurship
Chandna, V., & Salimath, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.019 · Cited by 82
Avolio, B. J., Wernsing, T. S., & Gardner, W. L. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206317739960 · Cited by 89
“Further, during our review of the SEM literature, we learned of an ongoing debate concerning the appropriate use and weight given to the chi-square statistic due to its sensitivity to sample size, data nonnormality, and estimation method (for extensive information on the context and viewpoints, see Bentler, 2000; Boll…”
MethodPoong, Y. S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. (2016) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666916638136 · Cited by 77
“However, chisquare is sensitive to sample size (Hooper, Coughlan and Mullen, 2008; Iacobucci, 2010).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Iacobucci, D.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Iacobucci, Dawn
- ORCID
- Iacobucci, Dawn
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-98
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W2038318317
- Cited by
- 2,263
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 193 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 186 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 208 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 193 · 2018: 169 · 2017: 129 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 34.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- structural equation modeling, model fit indices, sample size, moderators, longitudinal data, mediation, measurement model, structural model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review